In short
If the start date of interest was written wrongly, the line that is read is the date itself, not the sentence of the rate. The date on the payment order, or on the cover, stands apart from the date in the underlying document. The two lines are not two names of the same transaction. From which sentence the rate comes is in the article on interest in enforcement proceedings. This text does not repeat that guide.
If the date is not in the document, the blank on the order is not filled with a date that was guessed. A wrong date does not of itself remove the principal claim. A claim that was not removed is not run either as if the wrong date were right. The debtor places the date they see side by side with the date of the contract, the notice, the invoice, or the judgment. A date that was not placed side by side is not accepted as correct.
The date line is separated from the sentence of the rate
If interest was asked for in the request for proceedings, the date on which it began to run is written separately. The sentence of the rate does not stand in for that date. A writing of statutory interest does not, on its own, carry a date. A rate that does not carry a date does not have the start counted as being in the file. The debtor compares the date they see on the order with the date in the document. A date that does not stand in the document is not completed.
The cover breakdown can show the interval of accrued interest that is the product of this date. What the breakdown is is in the article on the cover account. This text does not redefine the breakdown. If the interval was built from the date that was written, an early or a late date builds the interval on that date too. The interval is not counted as having been corrected by changing the sentence of the rate.
Accrued interest and interest that will accrue are not the same line. What has accrued is the part that appears to have accumulated up to the moment of the proceedings. What will accrue is the sentence left to the later period. The basis of both is a start that was written in the file. If the start was not written, the sentence of interest that will accrue does not produce a date. A date that was not produced does not come out of the single amount on the cover either. A single amount that came out does not confirm both lines at once.
The date in the document and the date on the order
Which date is the basis is read from the contract, the notice, the invoice, or the judgment that stands in the file. This text does not announce a single rule of a start for every claim. If there is a notice, the date that produces the result comes out of the notice's own text. If there is no date in the text, the date is not completed. If the judgment wrote a date, the proceedings do not carry a start that goes beyond the date of the judgment. If there is no judgment in a file without a judgment, the date of a judgment is not added.
If the contract wrote one due date, the invoice wrote another due date, and the notice carries a third date, the three are not the same date. The request for proceedings must show which of them it rests on. If it does not show it, the three dates are not forced into a single date. Dates that were not forced stay in the file as separate lines. The debtor asks for the document the request rests on. If the document is not in the file, the date on the order does not stand in for the document.
The date of the invoice and the due date are separate too. The date the invoice was drawn up may not be the date the debt fell due. If falling due is not in the document, the date of the invoice is not completed as the date it fell due. The notice does not of itself take the place of the due date. If the record of service of the notice stands in the file, that record is kept. While there is no record, a date of service is not assumed. The service record is not put in place of the sentence of the rate either.
An early date and a late date
If the date on the order is before the date in the document, it is a date that was written early. An early date is the line on which the interest appears over a longer interval. This line is separate from a claim that the rate is high. The debtor does not produce a figure for the rate while showing the early date. An early date does not mean the principal claim arose early either. The principal claim stands on its own line, in its own document.
If the date on the order is after the date in the document, the interval may have stayed short. A short interval does not of itself build the debtor's own objection. The debtor reads an early date, or a date without a document, that was written against them. A late date that appears in their favour does not have a new sentence of a claim written for the debtor. The creditor cannot use the late date as a correction that is not in the document either. The correction is read from the document that stands in the file.
A partial payment does not of itself shift the start date. If a payment slip shows a payment, the payment stands on its own date. That date does not change places on the cover as the new form of the start of interest. The change of place is read from a writing about it, if there is one in the file. If there is no writing, the slip is not counted as having rebuilt the start. If the slip belongs to another file, the date of this file has not changed either.
If there are two dates on two copies of the same document, both are kept. The later copy is not counted as having erased the date of the earlier one. The erasure is read from an annotation, if the file writes it. While there is no annotation, the new copy does not correct the old date. The debtor looks, from the list of annexes in the request for proceedings, which copy was added to the request. If there is no list, both copies stand in the file. Copies that stand are not forced into a single date.
The interval on the cover does not correct the date
If the accrued interest on the cover stands as a single amount, the date the amount rests on is asked for. Without the date being shown, the amount is not counted as the right interval. An example of an amount is not in this text. The breakdown can show the result of the interval that was written. If the interval was built from a wrong date, the amount does not of itself correct the date. A fresh print of the breakdown carries the same interval too. The new print does not turn the old date into the document.
The end of the interval is a line as separate as the start. The interval is built from one date to another date. If the end date was not written, the end is not completed from the moment of attachment, or of collection. An end that was not completed does not make the start right either. If there is only one amount on the cover, it is asked between which two dates the amount was built. Without the two dates being shown, the amount is not the interval itself.
If there is one date in the request and another date on the cover, both are kept. The difference is not closed by forcing them into a single date. The date that is the basis is read from the contract, the notice, the invoice, or the judgment that stands in the file. If there is no document, the date is not completed. The petition does not force the date on the cover into the same sentence as the date of the request. A sentence that was forced hides which date is in dispute. A hidden difference stands for as long as it stands on the cover of the file.
Counsel's fee and the fee are not put in place of the start date. The fee line is in the article on counsel's fee, and the fee-of-proceedings line is in the article on the fee of the proceedings. This text does not write the petition of those two heads. A wrong date is not counted as having of itself made the fee, or the counsel's fee, excessive. If the excess appears on its own line, that line is read under its own name. The fee line being right does not make the date line right either.
Collection and attachment are not the start date
Attachment having been imposed does not make the date on the order right. The minute can show at which moment the goods were attached. The minute does not build, by standing in for the document, from which date the interest ran. The date of the attachment annotation is not the date of the notice, or of the contract. The annotation is not stuck onto the start line. An annotation that was stuck on is not counted as having closed the blank in the document.
A receipt of collection cannot confirm the start either. The receipt can show from which head the amount paid was deducted. If there is no receipt, collection is not assumed. If there is a deduction on the receipt called interest, the deduction does not mean the date on the order is right. The amount deducted can be the product of a wrong interval. The product does not turn the date into the document. If there is a collection that was returned, from which line the return was made is read from the record in the file. While there is no record, the return is not counted as having corrected the date.
Which enforcement office the file is at does not stand in for the date of the document either. Even if the office changes, the underlying document stays the same. The frame is on the enforcement and bankruptcy law page. The contact record stands for having the date line read side by side with the document. While there is no document, the date is not completed.
Two dates are not melted into a single sentence
If the debtor writes the date into the same sentence as the absence of the principal claim, which line is in dispute is lost. If the principal claim stands in the document, the principal claim stays under its own name. What is wrong is the date on which the interval of accrued interest was built. The two lines are shown separately. A line that was not shown separately is not melted inside a single sentence of denial. A melted sentence stands as if it targeted both the principal and the interval at once. When the target scatters, the office cannot draw from the file which document is being asked for.
The creditor cannot close the difference either by reducing the two dates to a single interval on the cover. The reduced interval does not stand in for the date in the document. If there is both a notice and a contract in the file, and the request rests on both, the sentences it rests on are read side by side. The date of one does not erase the date of the other. A date that was not erased is looked for on its own line in the later print of the cover too.
Conclusion
If the start date of interest was written wrongly, what is read is the date line that stands apart from the rate. If the date in the document and the date on the order conflict, the conflict stays as a date. A figure for the rate is not produced in this text. Attachment and collection cannot confirm a wrong date. The basis is the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code, Law No. 2004.