In short
Paying the renewal fee does not treat a file that fell out of process as open proceedings. The receipt does not show that the renewal request was entered against the file number. Even if the request was entered, a new order of attachment is not opened before it is served on the debtor. The sum is not in this text. The condition of falling out of process is in the article on a file that fell out of process. This text does not rebuild that guide.
The receipt is not the request line
The cashier's receipt carries the name of the head that was paid. The name being written as the renewal fee does not write that the directorate took the file back into process. Being taken into process is read from which file the renewal petition was tied to. Money paid while there is no petition does not produce an attachment letter. If the money entered the account of another file, this file is not opened either. If the number on the receipt and the directorate's statement conflict as to which file it was entered against, the statement is taken as the basis. If there is no statement, the number is not assumed.
The advance fee and the renewal fee are not the same head. The advance head taken at the start of the proceedings does not keep alive a file that later fell out of process. If the two receipts stand side by side, which one belongs to the renewal is separated from the name of the head. If there is no name, neither is treated as a renewal. An abbreviation of the head's name, or a cashier code, does not stand in for the petition. If the code does not show which file it was entered against, it is not said that a renewal was made for this file.
If the reference number of the electronic payment and the barcode or the file number in the petition are separate, the payment is not tied to this renewal. The debtor, or a third person, does not build the request by leaving money in the creditor's place. What builds the request is the petition of the creditor's side. If there is no file number in the petition, this file is not opened even if the money went to the right cashier.
The service slip is not read from the receipt
A new attachment is not asked for before the renewal request is served on the debtor. The service slip is not the printout of the receipt. A photograph of the receipt sent to the debtor does not stand in for the endorsement of the service officer. If there is no date in the endorsement, a date is not invented. A period is not written into this text. The endorsement should also show which file the request came out of. If the file number is not written, the slip is not counted as service of this file.
If the creditor is waiting for an official letter after receiving the receipt, the directorate looks first at the service line. If there is no line, the letter is not treated as having gone out with this waiting. If a writing has gone out, its basis is the service slip. The writing is not tied to the fee before the slip is shown. If the writing went to another debtor, or to an old address, service is not treated as completed for this debtor. Whether the address is correct is read from the endorsement on the service slip. If the endorsement shows that service could not be made, the request does not pass into the order of attachment as if service had been made.
Service on a representative is counted as service of these proceedings only if that representative is recorded in the file. A receipt in the hands of a representative who is not recorded is not service on the debtor. A slip that did not reach the debtor themselves is not completed with the receipt standing in the creditor's folder.
The head is not copied in a file on a judgment
In a renewal without a judgment, the fee can arise again. Its arising does not mean the file is declared open. This head cannot be added to the debtor's debt. A line that stands like a debt on the cover does not prove that the proceedings woke up. The proof is the line of the request and of the service. If the line on the cover stands as a head that should be collected from the creditor, that standing does not mean it was added to the debtor's debt. Whether it was added is seen by placing the cover and the renewal petition side by side.
In a file on a judgment, the renewal head of proceedings without a judgment is not copied. First it is separated whether the document in the papers is an enforcement order or a payment order. Before that is separated, it is not said that the receipt does the same work for both types. If it was written in a file on a judgment as if the head had arisen, that writing does not mean the rule for proceedings without a judgment was applied of itself. The writing is read together with the type of the order. Before the type is separated, neither a file on a judgment nor a file without one is declared open because the fee was paid.
The judgment becoming final, and the renewal, are separate records. An endorsement of finality does not treat a file that fell out of process as opened without a fee. Whether the fee arose is not in this text as a sum either. If the sum stands in the name of the head on the receipt, it is read from there. If it does not stand, it is not said that the same head exists for both types of file.
The old endorsement is not erased by the fee
The record that it fell out of process is not erased when the fee is entered. The new line can pass beside the old one, not in its place. The old line standing is not a sentence that the debt has ended either. That sentence is not built in this text. A waiver is under a waiver of the proceedings. A fee petition is not a waiver. The lifting of an attachment endorsement does not happen by the fee either. The writing that lifts it is under lifting an attachment. This text does not erase the endorsement.
The petition, the receipt and the service slip should carry the same file number. If one of the three is missing, open proceedings are not declared. The order of attachment is not assumed before the missing slip is completed. If the three papers are there, the reading is made from those documents through contact. The reading does not add an open record to the file. A block at the bank is not opened with the fee receipt either. The first reading of the account line is under my bank account was attached. The receipt is not the writing that lifts that line.
If the old attachment is standing, the renewal is not recounted as if it had placed that attachment anew, or as if it had erased it. Whether a new attachment was asked for is read from the request line after service. If there is no line, the fee is not treated as having revived the old endorsement. If there is a record that revived, that is the writing in the endorsement's own registry. Without a registry extract, the receipt does not clear the land register or the intermediary.
An expense head is not a service slip
The cost of service and the renewal fee are separate lines. Paying the cost does not show that the service slip was drawn up. The slip stands with the outgoing record and the endorsement. If there is no outgoing record, the cost receipt does not treat service as having been made. The creditor asking the fee back does not leave the file open either. A request for a refund may not mean the renewal petition was withdrawn. Withdrawal is read from the endorsement on the petition. If there is no endorsement, a refund of the fee does not of itself build the result that the request fell. The sum is still not written.
If the cost of service was paid for more than one debtor, each debtor's slip is separate. Service on one debtor does not treat the other as served. If a shared cost receipt does not show whom it went out to, service is not said to be complete for anyone. Showing it is the name and the file number on the outgoing list. If there is no list, the receipt is not put in place of the list.
If a refund of the fee has returned to the creditor's account, this return can mean the file was never renewed, and it can also mean the petition is still standing separately. Which it is is read from the refund slip and from the endorsement on the petition. If the two conflict, the conflict does not declare the file open. An attachment writing is not tied to this fee before the conflict is cured.
The fee does not rewrite the debt balance of the file either. The figure on the cover may have been standing even before the renewal petition. If the petition does not carry a line that changes this figure, the receipt is not treated as having increased the balance or as having zeroed it. An increase or a decrease is read only if it appears in a new endorsement on the cover. If there is no endorsement, the old cover and the receipt stand side by side, and neither on its own declares open proceedings.
The creditor paying money into more than one file at the same time does not renew all of them if there is no separate petition for each file. Which file number is written on the receipt separates that file from the other. A file number that was not written is not opened with a shared receipt. If the debtor sees the number of their own file on the receipt of another file, they do not count that receipt as service of these proceedings. Service is still in the endorsement of the slip that belongs to this file number.
If the cashier's receipt is a photocopy, it is required that the original record be the same file number as on the statement. If the number on the photocopy is faint, the number is not completed. A number that was not completed is not treated as the renewal of another file. The creditor does not put the photocopy in the file as if it had been served on the debtor. Service comes out with the endorsement on the slip. If the endorsement is built on the photocopy, that construction is not the officer's endorsement.
A photocopy that has no officer's endorsement is not a renewal request that was served on the debtor. The request is read when the petition and the slip stand together.
Conclusion
The renewal fee does not of itself treat a file that fell out of process as open. Whether it is treated as open is seen from the request being entered, and from service on the debtor. A sum and a period are not written. The frame is on the enforcement and bankruptcy law page. The basis is the renewal provisions of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code, Law No. 2004.