In short
The bank receipt and the reduction record at the enforcement office are read apart. The receipt shows the bank's movement of money. The reduction is the line on which the office reduced the file balance. The movement line does not of itself open the reduction line. If there is no reduction, the payment is not treated as collected in the file.
Which till the money will go to is under payment into the enforcement file. The deduction continuing even though collection was entered is under I paid the debt. The name of the head that can arise when the collection record is entered is in the article on the collection fee. This page does not write the rate of that head. That head is not assumed to have arisen before the reduction line is opened. This text separates whether a reduction can be treated as there because there is a receipt.
The status line of the bank printout
The date, the recipient account, the description and the status stand together on the receipt. If the status line says "in process", the money may not yet have passed to the other account. "It has passed to the account", or the bank's equivalent expression that it was completed, shows that the outgoing transfer has finished. The two expressions are not the same collection. An incomplete printout is not completed as a finished transfer.
The status line can be written in another word from bank to bank. If the word says "waiting", "in approval", or "at the other bank", the outgoing transfer is not treated as finished. For it to be treated as finished, it should be read that it was completed in the receipt's own language. If the language is not in the file, "completed" is not added. If the status line does not appear on a cropped printout, the place the movement reached is not completed either.
If the recipient account is not the cashier account of the enforcement office, the movement has gone somewhere else. A movement that went somewhere else does not produce a reduction at the office. A transfer that went to the creditor's, or the representative's, own account is outside this distinction. That that account is not the file's cashier stands in the article on payment into the file. This text does not treat that account as the office till. If the recipient IBAN is missing on the receipt, the account number the debtor remembered is not written onto the line. A remembered number does not stand in for the bank record.
The reduction record is read apart
The reduction is the record on which the collection at the office was entered against the balance. The record is looked for in the file account. Leaving the bank printout in the file does not create the record of itself. A delay on the screen, and a line that was never written, are not the same thing either. A claim of delay is not treated as accepted before the reduction line is shown. If there is no line, the balance is not assumed to have fallen.
The current balance is read with the statement after the reduction. The heads of the statement are under the cover account. This text does not write the order of the heads, or the sum. The reduction shows from the office line which debt decreased. If there is no file number on the line, which file fell is not completed. Even if the file number is written, if the sum line is blank, what fell is not completed either. A blank sum is not filled with the figure on the receipt, and the balance is not rebuilt.
More than one transfer may have entered on the same day. The office may have reduced one of them and held the other. A single slip on the receipt does not show that all the movements of that day were reduced. Which slip was tied to which reduction line is read when the description and the file number stand side by side. A slip that does not stand side by side is not chosen as the slip that was reduced.
While there is no reduction, the attachment is not treated as cut
The attachment writing can stand in its old state until the office reduces the balance and a new writing goes to the relevant institution. Showing the receipt to the bank or the employer does not lift that writing. The lifting is followed by the office record appearing at the institution. The deduction is not treated as ended before it appears. This result does not mean the debt continues undisputed. The meaning comes out of whether the reduction is in the file.
The institution does not treat the bank logo on the receipt as an order to lift the attachment. The order is the writing that came out of the office appearing in the institution's papers. If the writing has gone out but the institution has not yet processed it, the deduction can continue for a further period. That period is not fixed as a number on this page. Whether it was processed is read from the institution's own record line. If there is no line, the deduction is not declared ended by saying "the writing has gone".
The petition introduces the receipt to the office. The petition does not stand in for the reduction line. When the line is opened, the date is the date in the office record. The time the receipt was cut is not written in place of that date. If the time is not in the file, it is not added. The day the petition was referred and the day the reduction was written can be separate. Separate days are not stuck into a single moment. A date that was stuck on is not used as a calendar of objection or of deduction.
Money held, and a transfer that never went out
The money may have passed into the office's bank account, but not have been tied to any file. Money that was not tied does not reduce the file balance. A sum standing as held, and a transfer that stuck in process and never went out, are read apart. In the first, the bank's outgoing transfer has finished, and the office's matching has not. In the second, the money may not have left the debtor's account. The status line separates these two. Before they are separated, it is not said that "it reached enforcement".
Money that is held is not money that has returned to the debtor's account either. A return is a separate bank movement. If there is no receipt of that movement, the money is not counted in two places, both as held and as refunded. The count is made by reading the office cashier's statement and the bank's status line together. If one is missing, a photocopy of the other does not close the gap.
For the match, the file number on the receipt and the file number are placed side by side. If there is no number, the office cannot see from the printout which debt to tie the money to. A reduction opened without seeing it is not assumed in this text. In a transfer that never went out, the bank's status line is corrected first. The office does not write a reduction of money that did not go out. Passing into the file, as collection, money that did not go out, on the footing that "it will fall tomorrow", is not the work of this page.
A screenshot does not produce a line
If a photograph of the telephone screen does not carry the recipient, the description and the status lines on the receipt, the match is not completed. If only the sum and the time stand on a cropped image, it cannot be read whom the movement went to. A movement that cannot be read is not stuck into the file as a reduction at the office. A full receipt is the printout the bank cut. If the printout and the image conflict, the image is not written over the printout.
An application notification is within the same limit. The notification can remind that the money went out. If the reminder does not carry the recipient account and the file number, it does not open an office record. The time of the notification is not entered in the book as the date of the reduction. If there is no date in the book, a period or a closing is not built with the time of the notification.
A screenshot of the file account is not put in place of the bank receipt either. The office screen shows the balance. The bank receipt shows the movement. If the two are not in hand at the same time, which is current is not completed. A claim of currency is not treated as accepted before the dates of the two papers are written.
The slip and the endorsement in the file are not the same moment
The moment the bank slip was cut and the moment the office entered the endorsement are not the same box. The slip dates the movement of the money at the bank. The endorsement dates which file that movement was counted against. If the two dates do not stand side by side in the file, a single day is not chosen. A day that was not chosen is not declared the moment the attachment lifted.
If the endorsement says "collection", which slip it was tied to is read from the description line. If there is no description on the slip, the endorsement is not treated as having covered every receipt in hand. If three slips were cut on the same day and the endorsement is a single line, which slip fell is not completed. A slip that was not completed is not marked as the slip that fell.
The printout of the file account and the bank slip can be kept in separate hands. One can show the balance of a day earlier, and the other the movement of today. Which is current is read from each paper's own date. If one of the dates is faint, the faint paper does not stand in for the other. A paper that does not pass does not, on its own, build the sentence "it reached enforcement".
The office may have left the endorsement to another day after seeing the slip. Before the endorsement that was left is written, the slip is not treated as having reduced that day's balance. If which slip the endorsement belongs to is not in the description, the first receipt that was seen is not chosen. A receipt that was not chosen is not stuck into the file as a reduction. A receipt that was not stuck on does not lift the attachment writing at the institution either.
Conclusion
The receipt is not the reduction. If there is no reduction line in the file, the payment is not treated as entered in that file. A transfer still in process and money that has passed into the account are not the same record. Money that was not tied while it was held does not reduce the balance. The attachment is not treated as cut without the reduction and the institution's writing. The frame is on the enforcement and bankruptcy law page. Collection in the enforcement file is read according to the provisions of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code, Law No. 2004. If the receipt and the office line stand together, they can be read separately through contact.