In short
The courtroom, the time and the capacity are read on the paper of the first hearing. This text does not recount the result of absence, or participation by video. The name of the court, the file number and the day of the hearing are on the same paper. If the indictment is not in the annex, it is asked for from the file. A statement given at the public prosecutor's office is not the defence of this sitting. If the capacity is written as witness, the preparation is not built from this page.
The courtroom line also carries the time
The court, the day, the time and the courtroom are looked for on the summons. The courtroom is not chosen by a habit of the corridor. Even if there is more than one courthouse building in Ankara, the authority is the court in the heading of the summons. Which room of which building it is is read from this heading and from the courtroom line. The neighbourhood where the office is does not change this line. If the line is blank, the room of the previous sitting is not treated as written. It is asked of the registry by the file number. A room entered without asking is not the sitting that appears in the minutes. If the room the registry said does not stand on a new paper or in the minutes, the old courtroom line is not treated as lifted.
The time is the starting time of the hearing. The date on the endorsement of service is the day the paper arrived. The two dates do not do the same work. Taking the day of service as the time of the sitting leaves you at the door on another day. Absence is not recounted before the endorsement is read. If the time on the endorsement and the time on the summons conflict, the conflict is not hidden. Which is the time of the sitting is read from the hearing line in the text of the summons. The endorsement of service does not of itself change the time of the hearing. The result of absence is in the article on if the accused does not go to the hearing. This page does not build what result not going will give rise to.
If the summons is more than one page, it is looked at whether the courtroom and the time are the same on every page. If one page writes another time, the two times are not melted in the same sentence. Which page carries the endorsement of service is noted. A page that does not carry the endorsement does not, on its own, declare a new time. If there is no page number, which leaf remained missing is written from the number of leaves in hand. A missing leaf is not filled as if the courtroom were there.
The capacity line separates the accused
The same courthouse can issue separate papers to the accused, to a witness, to a complainant and to a participating party. The capacity line shows which preparation will be made. If it does not write the accused, the file is not read as if they were the accused. If it writes witness, the place to look is the article on a witness summons. That article recounts the witness's own paper. This page does not take on the obligation of that paper. The lines on oath and on declining, on a witness paper, are not carried onto the summons of the accused.
Being a complainant or a participating party does not mean the examination of the accused. The capacity of complainant does not carry the same set of rights as the person the charge is laid against at the hearing. If the summons writes one capacity and the minutes another, the two are not melted in the same sentence. Which is current is asked for from the file. A capacity is not chosen without asking. If the name on the summons is correct and the capacity appears to belong to another person, the difference is asked by writing the name line and the capacity line on the paper side by side. Preparation as the accused is not built on that paper before the difference is cured.
If there is more than one accused, the summons shows in whose name it was issued from the name line. Another accused person's summons is not your courtroom time. If the name line is missing, the missing name is not completed by guessing from the list of the accused in the file. The list is not put in place of the summons. If the summons and the name on the list do not match, the mismatch is written to the file before the hearing.
The indictment is not an annex of the summons
The summons says when and where to be. The indictment says which act came to the court under which name of offence. If the indictment is not in the annex, the name of the offence is not completed from a word on the summons. The indictment is obtained by the file number. The skeleton of the defence is not built before it is obtained. Which act the indictment ties to which accused person is read from the indictment's own paragraphs. While there is no paragraph, the act is not built from the short word on the summons. If the short word and the name in the indictment differ, the difference is the two texts standing side by side. The difference does not erase the courtroom line on the summons.
In some offences the statute requires defence counsel to be present at the hearing. This requirement comes out of the character of the charge. The sitting is not treated as cancelled because the name of defence counsel is blank on the summons. A blank line does not erase the requirement either. In which offence defence counsel is mandatory is not written on this page as a list. The list is seen when the indictment and the statute are placed side by side. If the name of defence counsel is written on the summons, the name is read from that line. If the name that was written and the counsel who came to the hearing differ, the difference is said so that it will be entered in the minutes. The name is not treated as changed before it is said.
A statement to the public prosecutor is a minute of the investigation. Those minutes can be read at the hearing. Their being read does not make the sentence the defence before the court. The frame before a statement is in the article on before giving a statement. The investigation step after the statement is also in the article on after the statement. Having the photocopy of the statement minutes read in the courtroom does not build a new sentence of defence. The defence is the word said before the court and entered in the minutes. If it is not in the minutes, it is left as not being there.
If two papers show two times
If the day on the first summons and the day on a paper that came later conflict, the later paper that has an endorsement of service is taken as the basis. An old time remembered from habit does not drop the new paper. If there is no endorsement, which one came out later is not guessed. A time gone to by a guess is not the time the court kept. Saying on the telephone that the time changed does not stand in for the endorsement either. The new time stands on the new paper or in the minutes. If it does not stand, the old line is not treated as erased. If the file numbers of the two papers differ, each belongs to its own file. Even if the numbers are alike, if the name of the court differs, the courtroom is read from the court in the heading.
An identity document is taken to the sitting. The document does not prove the capacity. The file number is read together with the name of the court. The number of another file does not open this courtroom. A difficulty can arise in being let in while there is no identity document. The difficulty that arises does not change the capacity on the summons. The capacity is still on the line of the paper. The request for participation by video, and the record in the minutes, are not recounted inside this check. That distinction is in the article on a hearing by SEGBİS. Even if the request was written, the courtroom is not treated as lifted before acceptance appears in the hearing minutes.
The copy to be asked for from the file
The summons says the courtroom and the time. Which act the defence will be built on is not completed before a copy of the indictment arrives. When the copy is asked for, the petition writes the name of the court on the summons and the file number. If the number cannot be read, it is said it cannot be read. A photocopy of another file is not put in place of this number. If there are minutes of a previous sitting, the time written in them can conflict with the summons in hand. The conflict is asked by placing the two papers side by side. The previous minutes do not erase the endorsement of service of the new summons. If the endorsement is on the new paper, the new paper is the basis. If the minutes write that the accused was given the floor, that sentence is not the defence of a sitting that has not yet come. The word to be said at the coming sitting is not treated as built before it is entered in that day's minutes.
If the subject of the hearing is written on the summons in a short word, the word does not stand in for the name of the offence in the indictment. The word is repeated in the petition as it is. The repetition is not choosing the legal character. The character is read from the indictment's own sentence after the indictment arrives. Before it arrives, the name of an offence is not written as a list. If a list posted at the door conflicts with the time on the summons, the written summons stands. The list is not a new paper that was served. The word of the officer who showed the list does not change the time either if there are no minutes. When the sitting is entered, that the file number was read in that courtroom is understood from the minutes. If the minutes write another number, the difference is said at that moment. Before it is said, the difference does not treat the person as never having entered. If the difference was not entered in the minutes, it is written to the file as not entered. If there is a line on the summons about whether the hearing will be open or closed, the line is read as it is. If there is no line, the sitting is not completed as closed. If a decision for a closed sitting is in separate minutes, the date of those minutes is not put in place of the day on the summons. The two papers stand side by side. The accused limits a document they will bring with them to those counted on the summons. If there is no list of documents on the summons, a list is not invented. Identity and the summons paper in hand are enough to read the courtroom line. An additional document, if it was asked for separately in the file, is read from the writing of that request.
Conclusion
The wrong courtroom, or an old time, is not treated as having attended the sitting on the paper. If the capacity is witness, the preparation kept for the accused does not fit that paper. If the indictment is not in the annex, the name of the offence is not built from the word on the summons. An article on absence, or on video, is not passed to before the three lines are corrected. The frame is on the criminal law page. The basis is the provisions on a summons to a hearing in the Code of Criminal Procedure, Law No. 5271.