In short
A claim that pre-operative tests were not done looks at whether the result requested for that patient stood before the incision record. There is not the same list for every operation. The request that was made, the result and the incision are read side by side. The anaesthesia record and the claim that the operation was unnecessary are separate doors. An amount of damages and statistics are not written in this text.
If the result came out after the incision, the physician may have incised without seeing that value. Whether that was unsafe for that patient is read from the note on the file and from the expert's frame. If the value is in place, the sentence that there was no test falls for that item. The sample belonging to another patient is not the subject of this record.
The item whose name is written on the request and the name on the result paper must be the same. If the names do not match, the result is not counted as the counterpart of that request. A name that does not match is not corrected of its own accord by another paper that arrives after the incision. The petition separates which name is the request and which name is the result. The separation is made when the two headings stand side by side.
Request, result and incision
The request paper shows that the test was requested. The result paper shows that the value came out. The incision record writes the moment the procedure was opened. If the three documents do not carry the same order, the claim is built from that order. The order is read from a conflict of barcode and time. This text does not set a number of hours. The conflict is in the line on the paper.
The expert's frame sits in the record on the expert report. The expert does not invent a common compulsory list. The item requested for that patient and the result that arrived are discussed. An item that was not requested is not written on the petition as if it were required in every operation. The file is requested through the patient file. A missing page is not completed as if the test never existed.
The anaesthesia record is separate
Airway and monitoring during anaesthesia sit in the record on an anaesthesia error. A blood count not arriving before the incision is not the record of the anaesthesia device. If the anaesthesia form is defective, that form is read from its own minutes. A laboratory result is not put in the place of anaesthesia monitoring. The two gaps are not dissolved in the same sentence.
That the operation was never necessary sits in the record on an unnecessary operation. A missing test in a necessary operation and an unnecessary operation are not the same event. The petition does not of itself merge the indication with the gap in tests. The decision separates which claim rests on which document. If there is no document name, neither claim is treated as having been built.
An emergency incision is not a copy of a planned incision
In unexpected bleeding or obstruction some tests may not arrive in time. The emergency note should write why it was not waited for. If there is no note, haste is not accepted of its own accord. The same haste is not assumed in a planned operation. An emergency sentence is not read as if it were added later to a planned record. The minutes show from the heading which procedure was planned.
The emergency note does not erase every item that was requested. If a result that arrived in time stands, that result is read separately. An item that did not arrive in time does not prove that the item which did arrive came out correctly. The application separates which item was in hand at the moment of the incision. The separation cannot be made without the request and result papers.
Amounts and statistics are not written
An amount of damages and statistics are not added to this record. A common complication rate is not written either. The claim is in the order of request, result and incision. If the order is in order, an amount is not discussed. If the order is out of order, the amount still does not take the place of the order. A rate or statistics are not added to the application petition.
An Ankara lawyer reads from the incision record that the office being in Çankaya does not change the competent authority. The office in Çankaya does not choose the authority for a health dispute. The name of the district does not take the place of the institution where the operation was done. The competent place is read from the dispute's own rule. The office address does not produce an amount of damages or statistics.
How the test record is read
The question of what happens if pre-operative tests are not done is built from the request, the result and the incision record. The same list is not written for every operation, and the anaesthesia form is not counted as a copy of the laboratory. An amount of damages and statistics are not written, and an emergency note is not put of its own accord in the place of a planned incision.
Conclusion
A pre-operative test is read from the request, the result and the incision record. There is no common compulsory list. The anaesthesia record and an unnecessary operation are separate doors. An amount of damages and statistics are not written. The framework sits on the health law page. The basis is Law No. 1219.