In short
Paying the counsel fee to the lawyer does not close the enforcement file. The lawyer's personal account and the enforcement office cashier are not the same till. Closure is read from the cashier slip, or from the collection line entered at the office. A lawyer's receipt does not take the place of that line. The size of the fee, and the path of objection, are not in this text.
Putting the money into the file account stands under payment into the enforcement file. A deduction continuing even though the money went out stands under I paid the debt. If a collection record opens on the file, the name of the item that can be mentioned stands in the writing on the collection fee. A transfer that went to the lawyer's till is not treated as having given birth to that item by itself. This text separates the lawyer's till from the office till.
The personal account and the cashier
The lawyer's personal account, the office account, or an IBAN sent by message is not the enforcement cashier. A transfer that goes to this account as "counsel fee" does not fall onto the office's collection ledger by itself. A transfer that did not fall is not treated as having reduced the file balance. The balance is read from the office record.
Writing "law office" as the name of the account does not create a cashier either. The office trade name is not the cashier trade name of the enforcement directorate. If the payee line on the receipt does not carry the directorate's name, the money is not treated as having entered the office till. If the payee line is blank, the payee is not completed from the form of address in the debtor's message. The form of address does not take the place of the bank record.
The rule does not change if the debtor paid the creditor's lawyer. The money went to the lawyer. The file sees that money only if it sees it in the office record. While there is no record, the sentence "the lawyer took it, the file is over" is not a closing. Cash handed over in person is inside the same limit. A witness account of the cash does not produce a cashier slip. If there is no slip, the cash does not stand on the file as collection.
Which record the file closes from
The file is read from the collection line at the office, or from a collection statement that entered the office. A self-employment receipt the lawyer issued is not one of those lines. The receipt is the lawyer's own record. The office does not reduce the balance before it sees the receipt. If the statement has not entered the office, an oral "I collected it" message is not enough either.
Writing onto the office the money taken outside the file is a separate record. This text does not write the conditions of that statement. While there is no statement and no cashier slip, the file can stay open. An attachment writing can stand on a file that stayed open. The bank and the employer do not count a lawyer's receipt as a lifting writing. Which item stands on the cover is in the writing on the cover account. This text does not line up the items and the amount.
A file number written on the receipt does not make the receipt a cashier slip either. The number can be a note the lawyer dropped onto their own record. The note does not open a collection line before it passes onto the office ledger. If the same number is not on the office ledger, the number on the receipt is not treated as having closed the file. The two papers are placed side by side. If one is missing, the other is not produced in its place.
A fee line does not erase the difference of tills
A fee line can appear against the debtor on the file. The name of that line is not erased by the money going to the lawyer in hand. The erasure appears in the office account. Before it appears, the line is treated as still standing. Even if the amount that went to the lawyer carries the same word as the item on the line, it is not the same till. A likeness of words does not produce a cashier record.
The principal claim, interest, expense, and the fee can stand on the cover under separate names. Money that went to the lawyer as "fee" is not treated as having erased the principal claim as well. Which item decreased is written only on the office line. If the line has no item name, the word on the lawyer's receipt does not rearrange the cover. A rearranged cover is not built on this page.
Whether an early payment reduces the fee is not answered here. The tariff is not applied. A rate is not written. The only difference that is read is which till the money stands in. If the till is not the office cashier, the file is not treated as having closed with the receipt in that till. An item paid in advance and a fee that went to the lawyer in hand are not melted in the same sentence. The melting is not done before a set-off record appears on the file.
A contract fee that went to one's own lawyer
The contractual fee the debtor paid to their own lawyer is separate from the other side's enforcement file. That fee is between the client and their own representative. The other side's attachment is not accepted as lifted by this payment. The contract does not write the balance on the other side's file. A contract that does not write it is not put in place of the office record.
An information note one's own lawyer gave is not a closing document either. The note can report the state of the file. If the reported state conflicts with the office extract, the extract is read. The date of the note is not entered at the cashier as the collection date. The date that is entered is the date on the office line. If there is no line, the date on the note is not made the day of closing.
Money paid to the other side's lawyer and money paid to one's own lawyer do not stand on the same receipt. Two payees are two tills. One's receipt does not close the other's file. Which receipt went to which payee is read from the payee's name. Without the payee's name being read, the sentence "I paid the lawyer" does not create a single till.
The tariff and the objection do not stand in this question
A claim that the fee was calculated high, that a wrong base was written, or that a separate objection will be made is another question. That question is not copied into this body. A complaint period, a tariff period, and a calculation table are not here. The person first looks at the payee name on the receipt. If the payee is the lawyer, it is not the office cashier. If the payee is the office cashier, the problem this writing separates is not on that receipt.
A petition does not turn the sentence "I paid the lawyer" into an office record. The turning appears only on the collection line at the office. If there is no line, a closing is not declared. A closing that was not declared is not accepted as having stopped the attachment. Writing "counsel fee" in the description is not read as tying the money to the file. The description carries an intention. Intention does not reduce the balance before it carries the money to the office cashier.
The fee line standing high on the cover does not make a transfer made to the lawyer a valid collection. A claim about the size and the difference of tills are separate questions. This page separates only the difference of tills. The size, the tariff, and the objection are the subject of another examination. The examination is not concluded here.
A handover in person does not open a cashier line
Cash may have been handed over at the lawyer's office. The handover is not money the office cashier saw. A cash book kept at the office is not counted as the enforcement collection ledger. A file number written in the book does not mean the number was carried to the office. The carrying appears only on the collection line at the office.
If the receipt and the handover in person are narrated at the same time, the two are not reduced to a single document. The receipt can be dated, and the handover can have been made on another day. If the days are not on the file, which one is the collection day is not chosen. A day that was not chosen is not written as the moment the attachment stopped. The bank and the employer do not process an office receipt as a lifting writing.
The debtor may have sent money separately both to the lawyer and to the office cashier. Two receipts are two tills. One does not cover the other's shortfall. The lawyer's receipt is not read as having completed the amount of the cashier receipt. An amount is not written on this page. Which till appears on the file is read from the office extract.
The lawyer may have notified the file that the money was received. If the notification paper does not stand in the office documents, an oral notification does not open a collection line. If the paper stands, the date is the day the paper entered the office. If the day it entered is missing, the day in the lawyer's own book is not made the office day. While there is no office day, the attachment is not declared lifted.
If more than one lawyer's name appears on the receipt, the payee is the account holder on the receipt. If the account holder is not the representative on the file, the money is not treated as having entered the file representative's till. An office partnership does not make every partner's account an enforcement cashier. An account that is not the cashier does not reduce the cover balance.
Even if the person who appears as payee on the receipt carries the same name as the representative on the file, the separation of tills continues if the account is not the enforcement cashier. A likeness of name does not pass the money onto the office ledger. Money that did not pass is not treated as having erased the fee line.
Conclusion
A counsel fee paid to the lawyer is not money that entered the enforcement cashier. The two tills stand apart. The file is not treated as closed without a collection record at the office. A contract fee that went to one's own lawyer does not close the other side's file. The tariff and the objection are not written into this text. The frame is on the enforcement and bankruptcy law page. Collection on the proceeding file is read under the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law No. 2004. If it is clear whom the receipt went to, it can be looked at separately through contact.