In short
Compulsory attendance at the prosecutor's office is a way of bringing the person to the authority when a summons in proper form is not obeyed, and it is not custody. Not every short message counts as a summons. The paper that is read is the service or the summons document. If there is an excuse, it is notified to the authority with a document. No custody day and no prison term are stated in this text. A period is read from the decision in hand, and a day is not added here.
A summons may carry a separate capacity for a suspect, a witness, or a victim. The capacity stands on the paper. If the capacity is not written, the person does not choose a capacity for themselves. A petition does not write a day that is not there, or a prison term that is not there. A decision is not built before the summons document is seen.
A route is not chosen without the summons document
First the genuineness of the summons is checked. What the summons means sits under a summons from the prosecutor. The document should show the day, the authority, and the capacity. If the day is not on the paper, a day is not invented. Service may show that the paper reached the person. If there is no service, receipt is not closed by assumption.
A summons in proper form, and a failure to come without an excuse, are where the route is spoken of. If the person came, compulsory attendance is not built as if they had not come. That they did not come is read from the institution's record. If there is no record, it is not said that they did not come. The application sets the summons and the record side by side. If the two documents conflict, it is distinguished which day's act it is.
The excuse document is notified to the authority
Illness or a serious obstacle is documented and notified to the authority. The notification is directed to the authority on the summons. An oral message, if it did not enter the record, stays weak. The document should show whether the obstacle fell on the day of the summons. If it does not show that, the excuse is not treated as compliance with the summons. The decision separates the notification and the medical document.
An obstacle document does not show an examination after the summons day as an excuse. The day is read when the summons and the date of the document are set side by side. If the two dates do not match, the excuse is not tied to that summons. Without the tie being made, the failure to come is not treated as documented. The petition does not reduce two dates that do not match to a single day.
If the excuse was not accepted, the refusal is read separately. If the refusal is not written, it is not assumed that the excuse was refused. The petition is not built as if a refusal were there when there is none. If a new day was given, that day is read from the summons or from the new document. This text does not add a number to that day. An invoice or a fee document does not stand in for the excuse.
Custody is not the name of this bringing
Custody is a separate measure, with its period and its rights. Those rights sit under rights in custody. Compulsory attendance is the act of bringing the person to the authority. The bringing does not carry a custody day into this text. A day is not written. A prison term is not written either. If the two acts are melted in the same record, which measure is being spoken of is lost.
After the person is brought to the authority, a statement may be taken. The statement itself sits under a statement at the prosecutor's office. The statement is not a copy of the bringing. The statement record does not stand in for the summons document. The petition does not write the two papers as a single act. The document should show in which capacity the statement was taken.
Preparing for a statement does not change compulsory attendance
Preparation before a statement sits under before giving a statement. Preparation does not by itself produce being treated as having obeyed the summons. If the summons day was missed, the missing is read from the record. Planning with counsel does not do away with the document. The application sets the summons, the service, and any excuse document side by side. A missing page is not completed as if it had produced custody.
There is no custody day and no prison term in this separation either. If a period stands in the decision in hand, it is read from there and is not copied here. If there is no decision, it is said there is no period. A period is not invented. The record may write the hour of the bringing. The hour that was written is not named a prison term. The petition does not turn the hour into a day.
Where the summons is read from
The question of what compulsory attendance at the prosecutor's office means is built from the summons document and the record of not coming. This act is not treated as custody. That the office is in Çankaya does not change the authority of the prosecutor's office. That is read from the document. A custody day and a prison term are not written. In the petition, the statement record is not put in place of the summons document.
Conclusion
Compulsory attendance is the route of bringing that comes onto the agenda when a summons in proper form is not obeyed. It is not custody. A custody day and a prison term are not written. An outcome is not spoken while the summons document does not stand. The frame sits on the criminal law page. The basis is the Criminal Procedure Code No. 5271.