In short
If maintenance and an attachment of salary collide on the same payslip, the order is read from the paper of the two deduction orders. The payslip shows the lines that were applied. The writings show the type of the order and the creditor. If there is no sentence of order on the paper, it is not said that maintenance is first, or that the attachment of wages is first. A deduction rate and an amount are not added if they are not in the writing. Attachment of wages is in an attachment placed on my salary. The whole of the enforcement of maintenance is in enforcement of a maintenance debt. The steps of those two paths are not rebuilt here.
How many deduction lines are on the payslip
If there are two separate deduction lines in the payslip breakdown, the file number and the creditor's name of each line are looked for. If there is no number, the line is not put in an order before it is known which writing it belongs to. An amount joined in a single line does not show the order of the two orders. If the line only writes "deduction" and there is no explanation under it, that line is not tied by itself to one of the two files. If there are payslips of more than one month, each month is read from its own lines. The order of last month is not carried onto this month if it is not on this month's paper.
The name of the claim in the two writings
If one writing shows the maintenance file and the other shows another attachment over wages, the types are not the same order. In the maintenance writing, the capacity of the creditor and the judgment or the enforcement information stand. In the wage writing, another creditor and another file may stand. If the capacities are read mixed, the order on the payslip is built wrongly. If the creditor's name is empty, the line is not written onto the creditor of the other writing.
The type is read from the name of the claim inside the writing, not from the short name on the cover. If the cover writes maintenance and inside there is another claim, the name inside is the basis. The cover does not change the content. If maintenance is written inside and the cover only says "attachment of salary", the name inside is still the basis. If the dates of the two writings differ, the date is not a sentence of order. If the date is not in the writing, which one came first is not completed from here. The general order of an attachment is in how an attachment happens. That general order does not build from memory the place of these two orders on the payslip.
The running item and the accumulated item
The maintenance writing may show separately an item that runs each period and an item that accumulated earlier. The accumulated item is not a copy of the running item. The wage-attachment writing is not the name of these two maintenance items. If there are three lines on the payslip, all three are tied to their own writing. If the file number of the third line is missing, that line is not added to one of the first two writings.
If the two lines are inside a single maintenance writing, the separation inside the writing is read so as not to mix this with an attachment of wages. How the judgment was put into enforcement stays in the maintenance writing. If the writing does not count which periods the accumulated item covers, the periods are not listed from here. That the running item belongs to this month is not accepted before the payslip period and the period in the writing come side by side. If the period is not in the writing, the line is not named as this month's maintenance.
A running item for a child and a running item for a spouse may also be separate names. If the writing shows the two creditors separately, the lines on the payslip are tied to that separation. If the creditors are gathered under a single name in the writing, the gathering is not split into two persons. The split is not made if it is not in the writing.
If the order is not on the paper, it is not written
The order the employer applied is visible on the payslip and in the writings. If it is not visible, a sentence of priority is not written from memory. The priority is not carried onto this page before the two writings and the payslip stand side by side. If the employer says I deducted this first, this word is compared with the order in the writings. If the word and the order conflict, the word is not treated as having changed the order. The conflict is seen by placing the papers side by side. When there is no conflict, an order is not invented.
The list of property that cannot be attached does not stand in for the order on the payslip. The list does not by itself say which of the two orders will be deducted first. If the deduction rate is not in the writing, the rate is not carried here. If the employer decided the rate themselves and entered it on the payslip, the entry does not stand in for the order in the writing. If there is no rate in the order, the application on the payslip is not treated as having completed the missing order. The application and the order should stand in the same sentence.
A joined line is not split in two
On a joined line, a copy of the two writings is asked for. The request is not for inventing a new order. It is for separating which order the line went to. If there is no copy, an order is not built by splitting the joined amount in two. Splitting it half and half is not done if there is no such split in the writing. If the amount of one order is known and the other is not, the remainder is not invented by deducting the known amount from the other. The account does not close if the remainder does not stand on the own line of each of the two writings.
The receipt should show which file number the money that was deducted went to. If the description is empty, the money is not treated as set off to both files at once. If there are two receipts, each receipt is read with its own number. If the numbers are crossed, the crossing stands together with the joined line on the payslip. The crossing is not corrected by erasing one receipt. If the employer issued a corrected payslip, the correction is not treated as ignoring the old line. The old line and the correction are read side by side.
A pension payslip is not the paper of this collision
A pension payslip is not the paper of the collision of maintenance and an attachment of salary on the wage payslip. That reading is under an attachment on a pension. A deduction on the pension slip is not carried onto the employer's payslip. If the person both receives a wage and receives a pension, the two paying places are two documents. A writing that went out to one is not entered by itself on the payslip of the other.
Unemployment benefit, a disability pension or a birth payment is not a column of this wage payslip either. If the name of those payments is not in the writing, it is not added to the maintenance line or to the wage-attachment line. A payment whose name stands in a separate breakdown does not explain the joined line on the payslip. Even if the social-assistance breakdown and the wage payslip went in the same month, the lines do not join. The joined line is not split into three before the name of this third payment is written.
If the employer changed, the order on the old payslip is not carried onto the new employer's payslip. If there is no writing that went out to the new employer, the old deduction is not treated as continuing from the new wage. If there are two employers, each payslip is read with its own writing. An employer who has no writing is not treated as having applied the other's order. If two payslips show a deduction in the same month, the file numbers are looked for separately. If there is no number, the two deductions are not joined as a single file.
The memorandum of the enforcement office and the creditor's notice are not the same paper. If there is no file number and no name of the claim in the notice, the notice is not counted as a deduction order. The notice does not stand in for the line on the payslip. If the memorandum is missing, the payslip line does not create the type of the order by itself. The type is read from the inner line of the writing in hand. If there is no writing, a type is not chosen. If the short decision of the maintenance judgment is not standing in the annex, the operative part is not completed from here. If there is no sentence of order in the operative part, a priority is not added to the operative part.
If the same debtor has two maintenance creditors, the writing of each creditor is separate. If there are two maintenance lines on the payslip, each line is tied to its own creditor. If there is no creditor's name, the lines are not joined as a single maintenance. If an attachment of wages enters between these two lines, that also stands with its own file number. If the number is missing on all three lines, the order is not invented from the arrangement of the lines. It is not said that the lower line is deducted later because the employer shows the maintenance line under the wage line. The arrangement is not a priority without the order in the writing. If a corrected payslip changes only one line, the line that did not change stays tied to its old order. If the old order is missing, the line that did not change also stays without a type. A line without a type is not filled with the type of the other. The name of the creditor's attorney does not stand in for the creditor's line. If the attorney line is empty, the attorney is not made the creditor.
Conclusion
Whichever order the two deduction orders stand in on the same payslip, the file number, the creditor's name and the type of the claim are read from those writings. A single joined line does not build an order. Running maintenance and accumulated maintenance are not multiplied as a single item if the writing does not separate them. The frame is on the enforcement and bankruptcy page. The basis is the text of Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law No. 2004. The two writings may stand together with the payslip in the record of contact.