In short
Additional damage is not added to the enforcement by itself as a second name for default interest. The interest line is not the ruling of the damage that exceeds it. The damage that exceeds it is not treated as having arisen in the file unless it is written separately in the request or in the judgment. The own frame of the interest is in the writing interest in enforcement. This page does not copy that guide.
If a line of additional damage is seen on the cover, the tie of the line to the request or to the judgment is looked for. If there is no tie, the line is not read as a renamed form of the interest. This reading does not produce an amount either. An amount that is not produced is not built by extending the interval of the interest either.
It is not a second name for the interest
Default interest is the interest line tied to late payment of the debt. Additional damage is the extra damage the creditor claims was not covered by this interest. The extra damage is not a synonym of the sentence of interest. If it is counted as a synonym, the debtor will have seen two items on one line. If the two items were asked for under one name, the name is separated. If the name that was separated does not stand on the cover, the name that does not stand is not assumed to exist.
The extra damage asks for its own document. The document is the record of the thing that was missed or that was paid in excess. If there is no record, the sentence of interest is not put in the place of that record. The record says what the damage is. A line on which what it is was not written is not a record of damage, even if it carries the name additional. The name does not hold the place of the record.
A general sentence that recounts that the creditor was pressed because of late payment is not a record either. If the general sentence does not show in the file which loss remained, the loss that is not shown is not completed. A loss that is not completed is not written as a second amount under the interest line. An amount that appears written is not counted as the product of the general sentence.
If there is no request and no operative part
If additional damage is not written in the request for enforcement, the payment order should not carry that item either. A line that appears on the cover when it is not in the order is not a part of the request. A line that is not a part is not completed by an attachment. If the copy of the request does not stand in the file, the list is not completed. If the copy stands, the line is read side by side with the name on the copy. A name that is not read side by side is not treated as having entered the request later.
If additional damage is not in the operative part of the judgment, the enforcement cannot operate the word in the reasoning as an operative part. If there is no operative part, the operative part is not completed. The damage having been discussed in the reasoning does not mean that an operative part was built. An operative part that was not built does not become an amount on the cover. If there is no name in the short decision and no operative part in the reasoned decision either, the two texts together do not give rise to the line either.
If the operative part of the judgment wrote a particular amount, the enforcement is in that amount. If there is a name in the operative part and no amount, the amount is not produced in this text. An amount that is not produced is not derived from the interest table. Deriving does not fill the silence of the judgment.
A record of damage is not an interest table
Interest having been calculated as accrued does not mean that the damage that exceeds it was calculated as well. An interval of interest is built from one date to another date. A line of additional damage is built on a record of damage. The interval does not stand in for the record of damage. The breakdown on the cover may show the two lines side by side. The definition of the breakdown is in the writing the cover account. The definition is not repeated here. Lines that stand side by side are not closed as one being the annex of the other.
The interest table is the calculation of the interval. The table being long does not mean that the damage that exceeds it is large. The table does not carry the name of the thing that was missed. A table that does not carry the name is not treated as having been added to the file as a document of additional damage. If a table was added, the table stays on the interest line. A paper that stayed on the interest line does not fill the line of extra damage.
If a bank writing, a receipt of an extra payment or some other record stands in the file, the record is read by its own name. It is not announced in this text that the record proves the additional damage. A result that is not announced does not require the record to be disregarded either. The record is kept. A record that is kept is not pasted in the place of the interest table. A record that is not pasted is not hidden inside the single total on the cover.
A sentence of the contract does not build the amount on the cover
If it is written in the contract that excess damage may be asked for, the sentence is kept. The sentence is not enough for the enforcement office to write the extra line by itself. A sentence that is not enough does not become an amount on the cover. If the sentence also does not say what the damage is and by which record it will be shown, the gap that does not say it is not completed.
If the sentence counted a particular item, the item that was counted is placed side by side with the record in the file. If there is no record, the item that was counted is not treated as having arisen. If the sentence did not use a name separate from the interest, the name is not produced by an interpretation of the contract. A name that is not produced is not carried into the request for enforcement by itself. If a name that is not carried appears as a line in the payment order, the line is compared with the request. The comparison does not turn the sentence into an amount.
A penalty clause in the contract is not additional damage either. If the clause carries its own name, the name is not changed to extra damage. If the cover wrote the clause under the name additional, the two names are read side by side. This text does not announce whether the clause may be asked for. A result that is not announced does not require the clause to be added to the interest line either.
A fee for representation and a fee of the file are not additional damage either. The fee is in the writing the attorney's fee in enforcement. The file fee is in the writing the enforcement fee. This page does not write those items inside the additional damage. An item that is not written is not turned into additional damage by the sentence of interest. If there is a presentation that turned it, the presentation does not erase the names of the items.
Compensation for denial is a separate item
Compensation for denial is not the other name of the line of additional damage. Denial is the result of an unjustified objection. Additional damage is the damage that is said to have remained outside the interest on late payment. The two are not melted in the same total. A total that was melted is not treated as having given rise to both items. This text does not recount the condition of compensation for denial. A condition that is not recounted is not put in the place of the record of additional damage.
The debtor having objected does not give rise to additional damage by itself. An objection that does not give rise to it does not turn the interest line into extra damage either. The creditor finding the objection unjustified does not stand in for a record when there is no record of damage in the file. The two claims may stand side by side in the same petition. Standing side by side does not join the names.
If the story of the damage in the creditor's petition is long, the length does not stand in for a record. If the story does not name the thing that was missed, the name is not completed from the interest line. If there is an item that was named, the item is placed side by side with a receipt or a similar paper. If the paper belongs to another debt, it is not written on the line of additional damage of this file. A paper that is not written does not become an operative part from the reasoning of the judgment either. Damage that does not stand as an operative part is not accepted as hidden inside the single total on the cover. A concealment that is not accepted does not mean that the debtor denied the whole debt either. The scope of the denial is read by writing separately which line is in dispute.
An attachment does not give rise to the damage that exceeds
An attachment does not announce the line of additional damage as correct. The minute shows the property. The minute does not build the existence of the damage that exceeds it. A block or a deduction does not make the line a document either. If the amount that was deducted does not carry the name additional, the amount that does not carry it is not treated as extra damage that was collected. If there is a deduction that carries the name, the deduction is compared with the line in the request. If there is no line in the request, the deduction has not widened the request.
The enforcement office does not write an amount by valuing the damage that exceeds it itself. A line on which an amount was written does not mean that the valuation was made. The valuation, if there is a record and a sentence of a judgment or of a request in the file, is read from there. If the record is uncertain, the uncertain line is not closed like a claim that has become final. A line that is not closed does not make the debtor's whole objection justified either. This text does not say the result of the objection. A result that is not said does not change the reading of whether the line stands in the request.
Whether the item stands in the enforcement file is read from the line of the request and of the judgment. The frame is on the page enforcement and bankruptcy. The contact record stands for having the basis of the line read. When there is no basis, an amount of extra damage is not completed.
If there is an amount deducted during collection under the name additional, the deduction is kept together with the line of the request. If there is no name in the request, the deduction does not announce a right that arose later. If there is a record of return, the record must show from which name it was returned. If it does not show it, the return is not treated as having closed both the interest line and the line of extra damage at once. Lines that are not closed stand on the cover. Lines that stand are not erased by themselves even if the attachment has come off. Erasure is read from the writing of correction in the file.
Conclusion
Additional damage is not a second name that comes by itself for default interest. Extra damage that is not written separately in the request or in the operative part of the judgment is not treated as having arisen on the cover. An interest table does not stand in for a record of damage. An attachment cannot confirm the line. The frame of the item in the file is read from Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law No. 2004 and from the line of the request.