In short
Once a trade-mark licence is entered on the register, the right of use can be asserted against third persons. The record does not pass ownership to the licensee. The owner, unless there is an assignment, is the person on the register. The question of how a licence is entered is answered by the register line and the application document, not by a notarial copy. The contract alone does not itself set up the effect of the register against a third person in good faith. Use before the record is made can stay weak against a later assignment or pledge, and the notary's date does not close this weakness.
A third person looks at the register
A contract can arise between the person who grants the licence and the licensee. A third person in good faith is not obliged to learn an unrecorded authority from the register. An unrecorded licence can stay weak against a later transaction. Service and a decision do not themselves make an authority that does not appear on the register conclusive against everyone. The application petition should show which field of the contract, with which record of duration, and with which limit, it carries onto the register. A width that is not written in the petition is not treated as having itself been carried onto the register line, and an invoice does not prove this width.
A notarial copy does not stand in for the line
A contract approved by a notary does not stand in for the register line. Which fee is paid is not a tariff here. The list of fees does not itself set up the effect of the record against a third person, and the effect depends on the writing on the register. An invoice or a payment slip for the price does not mean the licence record has been set up. Being in Çankaya does not choose the registry directorate where the record will be entered. The competent register is read from the institution record in the application papers, and the office address cannot be put in place of this record. Service does not choose the institution according to the district either.
An exclusive record is not an assignment
A licence can be exclusive or simple. The type does not change the owner's name. An exclusive record limits the grant of authority to someone else in the same field, and the limit does not mean ownership has changed hands. Assignment and licensing of a trade mark is the general frame of this distinction. Joint ownership of a trade mark describes more than one right holder. The licence record does not split that ownership. The exclusive quality does not erase the right holder's name from the register either, and unless there is a transaction of assignment the ownership line stays in place.
The field in the contract does not grow on the register
If there is no authority for a sub-licence in the contract, the licensee cannot assign the mark to someone else. The proportion of the price is not a compulsory field of the record, and a proportion is not invented. The field written in the contract does not grow by a width that does not pass onto the register. A patent licence is not a copy of the trade-mark register line. The trade-mark registration certificate is the document on which ownership appears. The licence record does not itself change the owner line of that document. A sub-licence is not treated as written on the register if it is not in the contract, and the proportion of the price is not a compulsory part of this line.
The record and the contract stand apart
The field to be entered on the register is the limit written in the contract. The petition cannot silently enlarge this limit, and a notarial copy is not treated as having itself opened the register line. An exclusive or simple type does not change the name of the right holder. If there is no transaction of assignment, ownership stays with the person who grants the licence. A third person is not obliged to learn an authority that does not appear on the register. Service and a decision do not make this gap conclusive against everyone. An invoice, a payment slip, and a fee document do not set up the effect of the record against a third person either. The application papers stay incomplete before they show which field they carry.
Conclusion
A licence entered on the register carries the effect against a third person. Ownership stays with the person who grants the licence. The general frame sits on the Ankara trade-mark lawyer page and in the text of the Industrial Property Code No. 6769. If there is no register line, the authority is not announced. The application document, the contract, and service do not stand in for this line. Even if the three stand together, an authority that does not appear on the register has not been announced against a third person. A notarial copy, an invoice, and a fee document do not open this line. An exclusive record does not assign ownership. A sub-licence is not treated as written on the register if it is not in the contract. The proportion of the price is not a compulsory part of the record. The application petition stays incomplete before it shows the field. Service does not close the gap, and a Çankaya address does not choose the registry directorate. The contract does not make an authority that does not appear on the register conclusive against a third person, a fee document does not open the line, and a payment slip is not treated as having set up the register record.