Health law · Legal information

What Happens If a Critical Test Result Is Not Reported?

Author · Av. Ayşenur Konar, Avukat

Published ·

In short

A critical test result not being reported is the laboratory value of the right patient remaining unanswered on the ward. Mixing of the sample is another record. The place that is read is the approval time of the value and the time of the first sentence on the ward. This note does not set a fixed number of minutes for the notification. A bad value does not itself change the name of the diagnosis. A damages figure and a statistic are not in this note.

The approval time and the clinical note

The result and the approval stand on the laboratory printout. The physician's or the nurse's note writes that the result was seen, that a repeat was asked for, or that the treatment changed. If the second line is missing, the value standing on the screen does not mean the clinician saw it. If the note says it was seen and the time is blank, the gap does not close either. A copy is asked for with an application for the patient file. A statement that notice was given by telephone is not counted as a document if it is not in the note.

The decision depends on the two times standing side by side. If one is missing, the missing link is written separately in the petition. A time told as if it had been filled in is not counted as a record if it is not on the printout. Which copy the printout was taken from is also stated. If copies taken on two dates conflict, the added line is marked.

A mixed tube and a late report

Another person's result coming out in your name sits on the mixed sample page. A tissue report being written late sits on the pathology delay page. The order in the emergency department sits on the emergency department page. A critical value is, most of the time, a laboratory result spoken of in the same admission. If three times join, the three records are kept apart. The measure of diagnosis is not written again here.

How a gap in time is read

The approval time and the time of the clinical note are looked for on the same page. The gap does not itself build a finding of fault. A damages figure and a statistic are not written. The address of the office in Çankaya does not change the laboratory where the test was done or the competent authority. The institution is read from the name on the request paper.

That the value is very high or very low does not prove the notification was late. The number can also come from the patient's illness. The question is whether the number remained unanswered on the ward. If an answer was written, whether the answer was in the right place is not the question of minutes on this record.

Where the trace of the notice stands

A claim of a telephone call, a short message, or an oral notice is read if it has fallen onto a line. If there is no line, notice is not treated as existing. The nurse's handover note and the physician's order may not show the same time. Both are kept. One does not erase the other. If the minutes write who called whom, that sentence speaks.

If the result told to the patient's relative differs from the ward note, the ward note is kept first. The relative's account does not stand in for the laboratory approval. The application asks for these two texts. A page that was not asked for does not mean an unreported result.

If a clinical answer was written

The question of what happens if the result is not reported is built from the clinical note staying blank, not from the value being bad. If the note has a request for a repeat, a change of treatment, or a sentence that it was seen, there is an answer. Whether the answer was medically in the right place is not the question of time on this record. The question of time is whether the answer was written at all. If it was written, the times are placed side by side. The times that are placed are not turned into a damages figure.

The laboratory's own internal correspondence can carry a time different from the ward note. Both times are kept. The ward is not treated as having seen it at the moment the laboratory saw it. For it to be treated as seen, a trace is needed in the ward note. If the trace is in the nurse's handover, it stands apart from the physician's order. Standing apart does not have one of them disregarded. Both remain as documents, and which one belongs to the clinician is read from the heading.

If the sentence told to the patient's relative conflicts with the value on the printout, the printout is kept. The relative's account can be support. The support does not stand in for the approval time. A statistical measure of late notification is not built in this note. That the measure is not built does not mean the gap will not be read at all. The gap is visible from the two times. A gap that is visible does not itself mean the clinician never looked. If they looked, a trace is looked for in the note. If there is no trace, a statement that it was looked at is not counted as a record.

Conclusion

A critical test is read from the approval time and the time of the clinical note. There is no fixed number of minutes. A lawyer in Ankara does not turn a gap in time into a fixed number of minutes. A mixed sample is another record. The frame sits on the health law page.

The basis is Article 14 of the Patient Rights Regulation and Law No. 1219.

Legislation

Frequently asked questions

Within how many minutes should a critical result be reported?

This note does not set a number of minutes. The time the value was produced or approved and the time of the first note on the ward are read side by side. A gap is not itself fault.

Is another patient's test also a notification?

No. Mixing of the sample is in a separate note. What is read here is whether the right patient's right value reached the ward.

If the result is very bad, is the diagnosis wrong as well?

Not on its own. The general measure of a diagnosis is in a separate note. The question here is at what time the result appeared to the clinician.

Related reading

This article sits under one practice area. The neighbouring guides carry the detail that does not belong in this text.

Practice areas · Health law

Sources

AK

Author

Av. Ayşenur Konar

Lawyer on the Ankara Bar Association roll, founder of Konar Hukuk. This text is general information; a specific file is reviewed separately. Author profile · Editorial policy

A consultation

We can look at the matter with you. The path depends on the documents. This is not a promise about the result.

Call