In short
On the paper of a charge of inviolability of the dwelling, a claim that the dwelling was entered without consent is read first. If the paper writes, instead of this, that after entry with consent there was no leaving, the sentence that is read is that one. This charge is separate from the line of theft. You do not tell how entry was made before seeing the sentence of consent.
The sentence of consent
The first reading is whether it is put forward that a dwelling was entered without consent. If there is no sentence of consent, do not complete it as if there were no consent. The person whose consent is looked for is the person to whom the paper writes the right in the dwelling. If the name is blank, do not add a name. Do not build yourself the order of owner, tenant, or person living together. The order is read from there only if the paper built it.
If the complaint petition says "I had no permission", and the charge paper leaves the sentence of consent blank, what is read is the charge paper. The sentence in the petition does not itself fill the consent line. The two papers stand side by side. If a written permission, a message, or a handing over of a key is mentioned on the paper, that mention is read. A permission that is not mentioned is not treated as existing. If the permission is tied to an hour, the hour is read from the paper. If there is no hour, do not add an hour.
In the investigation your capacity is suspect. After the indictment is accepted the capacity becomes accused. When the capacity changes, read the consent line again. If the sentence of consent has changed on the new paper, the sentence that changed was not accepted in the old statement. Defence counsel separates the dwelling line from the property line. Your silence does not mean you accepted entry without consent.
The claim that there was no leaving
A claim that, after entry with consent, there was no leaving is not a synonym of a claim of entry without consent. Whichever the paper writes, that sentence is read. If both stand, the two lines are separate. One does not complete the other. If the moment leaving was asked for is not on the paper, do not add that moment. If the moment it was asked for is written, that moment is not put in place of the moment of entry. If the two moments differ, both stand.
If the paper carries a sentence of a qualifying circumstance, that sentence is separated from the basic charge. Which state the circumstance is is not counted before it is written on the paper. The sentence of the circumstance is not turned into a description of the entry. You are not forced, in the statement, to tell this description. If the circumstance is not written, do not choose a state from a list and add it. If there is more than one sentence of a circumstance, each stays on its own line.
The line of the place and of the appurtenance
The place of the dwelling is on the address line of the paper. If there is no address, do not invent an address. The name of the city does not fill the sentence of consent. If the address says one place in the complaint and another place in the minutes, the two addresses stay side by side. A single address is not built by erasing one of them. If the door number is blank, do not complete the number yourself.
If an appurtenance is written separately, the place line is read apart from the dwelling. What the appurtenance is is not completed with an abstract list. If the paper only says "garden" or "appurtenance", that word is read. If there is no description of a place beyond the word, do not add a description. The dwelling line and the appurtenance line are not the same act. If both are written, the two places stand apart. A claim at one place does not itself cover the other place.
From whom consent is expected
Consent is a sentence expected from the person the paper counts as the right holder. If that person is not written, the line stays blank. Do not fill the blank. If there is more than one name, the consent of each name is a separate sentence. It is not said that the other's consent existed in one person's name. The person written as living together and the person written as owner may not stand on the same line. If the paper does not say whom it counts as the right holder, do not build an order yourself.
If a visit, a kinship, or a work relationship is not mentioned on the paper, this relationship is not counted as consent. If it is mentioned, the mention stands beside the sentence of consent. The name of the relationship does not itself erase the claim of entry without consent. In the statement do not put the relationship in place of the paper's sentence of consent. If there is a document of the relationship, the document is read. If there is no document, do not assume a document.
Taking the property does not build the dwelling sentence
A claim of theft speaks of the property being taken. The place of that reading is the charge of theft page. The dwelling claim speaks of the sentence of consent relating to the dwelling. If there is no property line, do not complete the dwelling charge into theft. Even if there is a property line, the dwelling line is not the short name of the act of taking. If the two names stand side by side, two lines are read. The manner of taking and the manner of entry are not looked for here.
If a result on the body appears on the same papers, that name is separate as well. The dwelling sentence is not built with a finding of injury. An offence of speech is not opened on this page either. Each name stays in its own element. Do not join the three names in a single answer in the statement. Separate which line you answered.
The statement comes after the consent line
The general list of the complaint sits on the I was complained of page. Here the line of consent and of the dwelling is read. The steps of that list are not repeated. The statement is not opened before the sentence of consent is seen. The preparation sits on the before giving a statement page. Do not write, by a guess, into the blank of the paper an entry you do not remember. The minutes are read before the signature. An address that did not pass into the minutes is not treated as existing by the signature.
If there is a decision on a measure, that decision does not mean the claim of entry is established. The general side of the measure sits on the judicial control page. Do not take the list of obligations into this note. The measure does not stand in for the sentence of consent. A word in the decision on the measure does not change the person counted as the right holder. If a second statement is asked for on the same day, first read again the sentence of consent in the first minutes. A permission that is not in the first minutes is not treated as added later to the second minutes.
Separate four lines on the paper. The first is the address of the place. The second is whether the sentence of consent is entry or not leaving. The third is the person counted as the right holder. The fourth, if there is one, is the sentence of the circumstance. If one of the four is blank, do not fill the blank with the others. While there is no address, do not count the name of the city as the address. While there is no right holder, do not build an order of tenant or owner. While there is no circumstance, do not choose a state from a list.
If there are persons written as having entered together, the sentence of consent of each person is separate. If your name stands on the summons and the sentence of consent stands with another person, the two lines do not mix. Being alongside does not write entry without consent onto you. If the paper does not say to whom it ties the act, do not build the tie yourself. If a claim of being called by a message is not mentioned on the paper, do not write the call as consent. If it is mentioned, the mention stands beside the consent line. The call does not itself erase the sentence of not leaving.
During the signature, separate which sentence you answered. An answer given to the sentence of entry is not an acceptance of the sentence of not leaving. An entry story told without separating carries into the minutes a manner that is not on the paper. The manner is not looked for as an element of the charge. For that reason the minutes are read with the sentence of consent seen. If the file number differs on the summons and on the charge paper, do not add the address in the second number to this dwelling.
If more than one address is written, each address stands with its own sentence of consent. A single dwelling is not built by joining the addresses. If a permission is mentioned at one address and not at the other, do not carry the permission to the second address. If the sentence of not leaving stands at only one place, that sentence is not spread to the other place. If the appurtenance line is separate from the dwelling, do not write the claim at the appurtenance inside the dwelling sentence. Separate the places in the statement. Let it appear in the minutes which address you answered. A separation that does not appear is not treated as made by the signature. The name of the city does not make the addresses you did not separate into a single place. If a witness says "they were there", this word does not cover a place that is not written on the address line. The witness's sentence and the address line stay side by side. Do not add a door number that is not on the line yourself either. An addition stands only if it is passed into the minutes. If the word consent appears with the witness and is not on the paper, consent is not produced from the witness's sentence. If a permission is written at an hour, that hour is not put in place of the moment leaving was asked for. If the two hours differ, keep both. If one of the hours is blank, do not produce the blank hour from the full hour.
Conclusion
The paper of inviolability of the dwelling is read with the sentence of entry without consent, or of not leaving after consent. The two sentences are not the same charge. If the right holder is not on the paper, they are not added. The line of theft does not build the dwelling. The frame sits on the criminal law page. Your consent line can be read together with the file through contact. The basis is the text of the Turkish Penal Code No. 5237 and the Code of Criminal Procedure No. 5271.