In short
A refusal of concordat ratification does not erase the moratorium announcement backwards. The refusal is the decision by which the court did not approve the concordat proposal. The announcement stands as the notice of the record on which it was published. What will happen to enforcement after the refusal is read from the text of the refusal. A proposal that was not approved does not enter into force. The debt does not fall on its own. Bankruptcy exists only if it is written in the refusal decision.
The refusal does not put the proposal into force
The operative part of the refusal says that the project was not ratified. The payment arrangement in the proposal does not enter into force with this operative part. The creditor cannot read the refusal decision as the project staying standing. The debtor cannot read the same decision as the debt having been erased. If neither reading is in the text, it is not added to the text. The general difference between concordat and bankruptcy is in a separate note. The difference does not erase the refusal announcement. The account of the difference does not fill the blank in the operative part of the refusal.
If the text of the proposal stands on the file, the proposal is read as a suggestion that was not approved. The suggestion is not treated as having bound the creditor. The language of maturity or of a reduction in the suggestion is not operated together with the refusal. The language is read on that file only if it exists in a text that was ratified. If there is no ratification on this file, the language does not produce a result deducted from the debt. The creditor is not written as if they had later asked for the reduction in the proposal that was refused either.
The commissioner's report does not stand in for the refusal decision. Even if the report found the project suitable, suitability is not ratification. If the report is negative, the negativity is not counted as a refusal while there is no operative part of refusal. If the operative part is shorter than the report, the short operative part stays. If the list of claims in the report is not in the operative part, it is not added to the operative part.
The moratorium announcement stands
The moratorium announcement is the notice of the moratorium decision. The refusal does not make that notice as if it had never been made. Two lines can stand one under the other on the register. Which one is the later transaction is read from the date and from the name of the decision. Tearing the old line is not a part of the operative part of the refusal. If the announcement of the provisional moratorium and the announcement of the definitive moratorium are separate lines, both stand. If the refusal mentions only one of the two, the line that was mentioned is read. The line that was not mentioned is not buried inside the one that was mentioned.
Whether the moratorium, at the time it was announced, stayed the proceeding sits in the moratorium note. This note does not rewrite the regime of the stay of that period. It only refuses that the refusal erased the announcement backwards. If the stay has ended, the ending is read from the refusal decision's own sentence. If there is no sentence, the ending is not chosen from the imprint of the announcement. The imprint is the record of the notice. The imprint is not the annotation that opens or closes an attachment.
If the refusal announcement has come out on the register, and a copy of the decision also stands, the copy is the basis. If the announcement is short and the copy is long, the short announcement does not complete the copy. If the copy carries a sentence of bankruptcy that is not in the announcement, the sentence is read from the copy. A result that is in the announcement and not in the copy is not counted as a result.
The bankruptcy line is looked for in the operative part
The refusal does not, on its own, set up that bankruptcy was opened. If bankruptcy is written in the same decision or separately, that writing is read. If it is not written, bankruptcy is not treated as existing. If it is written, the scope of the bankruptcy is limited to the sentence it was written in. Property or a claim that is not in the sentence is not added. If there is no sentence of bankruptcy for a debtor who is not subject to bankruptcy, the sentence is not added. If there is a sentence, the sentence is read without erasing the refusal announcement.
The door of bankruptcy and the door of refusal are not mixed. While the refusal announcement stands, the bankruptcy line can also be read. If the two stand on the same paper, both are read. One is not drawn in place of the other. Which door is which transaction is separated from the operative part's own name. If there is no name, a door is not chosen. A bankruptcy decision of another debtor is not pasted onto the door that was not chosen.
The bankruptcy administration, or the bankruptcy office, is not assumed to have been set up on this refusal file. If there is a line that writes that it was set up, that line is read. If there is not, the administration is not completed as a continuation of the commissioner. The commissioner's name can still stand in the announcement after the refusal. That it stands does not mean the bankruptcy administration was set up. The administration is looked for in its own writing of appointment.
Enforcement is read from the operative part of the refusal
Continuing the attachment after the refusal, a new proceeding, or the lifting of the stay is read from the operative part of the refusal decision. While there is no decision, it is not said that every attachment was opened. If the request was renewed on the file, the minutes of the renewal are read. If there are no minutes, the request is not completed as if it existed. The enforcement directorate's annotation of "continuing" or "pending" is on its own file. If there is no annotation, the annotation is not written from the refusal announcement. If there is an annotation, the annotation does not enlarge a result that is not in the refusal decision.
If there is more than one enforcement file, each file is read with its own number. If the refusal decision mentions one number, the file that was mentioned is that number. A file that was not mentioned is not tied to the same fate as the one that was mentioned. A deduction from wages, an attachment, and a sale are separate transactions. If the decision says one of these, what was said is read. What was not said is not assumed inside what was said.
If the creditor wants back an amount they paid before the refusal, the document of the request is separate. If there is no document, the refusal is not treated as having itself returned the money. If the payment slip shows which file it was written to, that file is read. If there is no showing, the slip is not divided across all the files.
The list is not erased backwards
The list of claims does not itself return to the enforcement file with the refusal. The place of the list is the recording of the claim. The refusal does not destroy that list backwards. If the later effect of the list stands separately in the decision, that effect is read. If it does not stand, the list is not treated as erased because of the refusal. A line that writes acceptance on the list is not treated as refused together with the refusal. A line that writes refusal on the list is not treated as refused a second time by the refusal decision. Each writing is the record on its own date.
A claim that never entered the list does not enter because of the refusal either. If an item that did not enter still stands separately on the enforcement file, it is read from that file. If there is no file, the item is not produced from the operative part of the refusal. If the commissioner's writing of acceptance conflicts with the court's operative part of refusal, the project does not run, because the operative part did not say the project was approved. The writing of acceptance is not the sentence that the project entered into force.
The reasoning does not lengthen the operative part
The reasoning of the refusal stands in the reasoning section of the decision. While there is no reasoning, the reasoning is not completed. If the sentence in the reasoning is longer than the operative part, a result that is not in the operative part is not produced. If the operative part is short, it is read in its short state. If the reasoning tells that the debtor is insolvent, the account does not build bankruptcy while there is no bankruptcy in the operative part. If the reasoning speaks of a majority of the creditors, the speech does not build ratification while there is no ratification in the operative part.
If there is a dissent or a note of opposition, the note does not stand in for the operative part. If the note finds the ratification correct, the finding does not turn the operative part of refusal into ratification. If the note wants bankruptcy, the request does not become bankruptcy while there is no bankruptcy in the operative part. If an interim decision and the final refusal are mixed, the heading is looked at. If the heading is an interim decision, a final refusal is not assumed. If the heading is a refusal, the list of missing papers in the interim decision is not taken for the whole of the reasoning of the refusal.
The annexes of the proposal do not themselves run inside the operative part of the refusal. If the list of annexes stands under the decision, the list is read. If it does not stand, an annex is not chosen from the project. The payment table in the annex does not become, together with the refusal, a schedule deducted from the debt. The table stays as a part of the suggestion that was not approved. The creditor cannot write the reduced amount on the table as the new principal of the remaining claim. The debtor cannot show the reduction on the table as if it had been paid either. A payment exists only if it appears on the payment slip. If the slip exceeds the line on the table, the exceeding part is left as absent if it is not on the table.
Reaching the parties of the refusal decision is a separate annotation. If there is no annotation, reaching is not assumed. If the annotation belongs to the debtor, the creditor is not treated as having been reached. Each creditor's own annotation is looked for. A joint announcement is not put in place of a separate reaching of each creditor. The announcement is the notice of the text of the refusal. The notice does not fill the blank of the annotation. The commissioner's last report does not lengthen the operative part of the refusal either. If the report left a claim out, the leaving out is not added to the operative part if it is not in the operative part. If it is in the operative part, the sentence in the operative part is read. The account of a majority in the report does not produce an approval. If there is a number in the account, the number does not become a judgment while it is not in the operative part. If it is not in the operative part, the number is not carried into this note.
The frame sits on the enforcement and bankruptcy law page. A copy of the refusal can be asked about from the contact page. The question does not add a result that is not in the decision.
Conclusion
A refusal of ratification does not erase the moratorium announcement backwards. The refusal shows that the proposal was not approved. A proposal that was not approved does not lift the debt. Bankruptcy and enforcement are read from the refusal decision's own line. The list does not disappear backwards with the refusal. The basis is the provisions of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code No. 2004.