In short
A balance of debt after a concordat does not fall by itself. In a ratified concordat, the debt that falls within the scope of the offer is read according to that offer. The amount that remains outside the scope is read from the ratification decision and from the text of the offer. If the text does not write an item, this note does not add a reduction to it. A reduction or a maturity inside the scope exists only if it is written in the text. If it is not written, the debt is not assumed to have been lifted.
The offer binds the item it writes
The decision counts which claims were bound to the offer, or it refers to the text of the offer. A claim that was not counted is not completed as if it had been counted. If the offer uses the language of maturity or of reduction, that language is applied to the item where it was written. The language does not itself pass to the item beside it. The general name of concordat is in a separate note. The definition does not produce a balance. The word restructuring in the definition does not bring an invoice that was not written into the scope.
If there is a measure figure in the offer, the figure is read only against the claim that sentence points to. If there is no figure, a figure is not produced. If the sentence says these invoices, a cheque, a suretyship, or an employment balance is not added to that sentence. The addition is read if it is written separately in the text. If it is not written, there is no addition. If the invoice numbers were counted one by one, an invoice that was not counted is not hidden inside the ones that were counted. If a range was written, the range is limited to the first and last number in the text. If there is no range, a limit is not invented.
If the ratification decision bound the offer as it stands, the sentence of the offer is read. If the decision left a part of the offer outside, the part that was left outside does not run. If the name of the part is not in the paragraph, which part was left outside is not chosen. A part that was not chosen is not said both to run and not to run.
An amount outside the scope stands
An amount that remains outside the offer does not itself close with ratification. Closing exists if the text covers that amount too. If the text is silent, the silence is not counted as a waiver. The creditor does not receive a promise that everything outside the scope will at once be collected in full either. The path of collection is read from the item's own file. This note does not build a result of collection. If the file number is not in the offer, the number is not added.
That a proceeding stopped while the moratorium continued does not mean the balance after ratification fell. The stay sits in the moratorium note. The two questions are not mixed. The balance is not erased as if the moratorium had ended. The moratorium is not told as if the balance had been erased. The announcement of the moratorium is not put in place of the text of ratification. The announcement of ratification is not treated as having covered an item that was not written in the offer either.
If there is an enforcement file opened for the amount outside the scope, the file is read from its own papers. If there is no file, it is not said that every claim outside the scope turned to enforcement. An attachment, a sale, or a deduction is not produced from the silence of the offer. Production exists only if the minutes of that transaction stand.
A slip does not close an item it does not describe
A payment made according to the offer shows that part of the item that was paid. The slip does not close an item that is not in the offer. If the description says which debt it was written to, that saying is read. If there is no description, a description is not invented. A partial payment is not a sentence that the remainder was given away. If a giving away is written in the offer, it is read as far as it was written. If there is more than one slip, each slip stands with its own description. The descriptions are not added together and absorbed into an item that was not written.
The amount that entered the bank account is limited to the creditor on the slip. If the creditor's name is not on the account statement, the name is not chosen from the statement. A payment made to another company inside the same holding is not written into this debtor's offer. The writing exists if this debtor and this item appear on the slip. If they do not appear, there is no appearance.
A payment called an instalment is read from that arrangement if an instalment arrangement is written in the offer. If there is no arrangement, a single slip is not treated as having closed the whole balance. If the arrangement is written and one instalment is missing, the missing one is not completed as if it had been paid. The missing part is read from the total of the slips. If there is no document of the total, the total is not remembered.
The list is not the scope of ratification
The general list is the recording work before ratification. Its place is the recording of the claim. Having passed onto the list does not mean that item was counted inside the scope at ratification. The scope is read separately from the text of ratification. An item that is on the list and not in the offer does not close as if there were an offer. An item that is in the offer and not on the list does not leave the scope because the list is silent either. The leaving exists if the text of ratification leaves that item outside.
The commissioner's writing of acceptance may have confirmed a line before ratification. The confirmation is not the reduction sentence of the offer. If the amount that was accepted was not bound separately in the offer, it is not treated as bound. A line that was refused does not itself become an acceptance with ratification. The refusal stands in its own writing. Ratification does not erase the writing of refusal backwards.
The minutes of the creditors' board are separate from the text of the offer. If the minutes mention an item and the offer does not, the two texts conflict. In the conflict, the text to which the court's ratification paragraph refers is read. If the paragraph does not refer to the minutes, the minutes do not stand in for the offer. If it does refer, the page that was referred to is read. An item that is not on the page that was referred to is not added.
Silence is not a waiver
A creditor whose name does not appear in the offer does not give up the claim by staying silent. A creditor whose name does appear does not erase an amount the text did not write either. Giving up is a separate document. If there is no document, there is no giving up. If a release was said, the text of the release is read. If there is no text of release, a release is not assumed. If the release uses a general sentence for all the debts of one company, the sentence is kept limited to the person and the item counted in the sentence. If there is no count, the general sentence is not spread to claims that do not appear on the file.
Not voting is not a waiver. Saying no in the vote is not giving up the claim either. The ballot paper is not put in place of the scope sentence of the offer. If there is no amount on the paper, the amount is not produced from the voting ratio. A creditor who did not attend the meeting is not treated as having attended and accepted. If there is no attendance list, attendance is not assumed.
The surety and the employment claim stay on their own line
The surety's debt is not added to the sentence of the offer if it was not written separately in the principal offer. If it was written, the limit where it was written is read. If there is no limit, a limit is not produced. The deed of suretyship is not itself bound as an annex of the offer. If the instrument is not on the list of annexes, the instrument is outside the scope. A suretyship outside the scope is not treated as having shrunk together with the reduction of the principal debt. The shrinking is read only if the offer writes that shrinking.
The employment item is looked for on its own line too. If there is no line, it is not joined to an ordinary invoice balance. If wages, severance, and notice pay were mentioned separately in the offer, they are read apart. If only wages were mentioned, severance is not written inside the wages. If the workers were mentioned as a group whose names do not appear in the offer, under the word "personnel", the mention is limited to its own sentence. If the sentence does not count an amount, the amount is not carried from the payroll into this note. The payroll can be the basis of the item. The basis does not, on its own, choose the scope of the offer.
If the offer does not speak of interest, of a cost, or of a penalty record, these items are not added to the text. If it does speak of them, the speaking is applied to the debt where it was written. It does not pass to the invoice beside it. If the currency is written in the offer, that unit is read. A conversion into another unit is not made if it is not in the text. If the conversion rate stands on the slip, the rate is the description of that slip. If there is no description, a rate is not chosen. A rate that was not chosen does not melt the balance into another debt.
If a letter of guarantee or a mortgage is not mentioned in the scope sentence of the offer, there is no mention. If there is a mention, the limit of the mention is read. The amount of the letter at the bank does not itself close the balance in the offer. Whichever letter the bank's writing belongs to, that letter is read. If there is no writing, the letter is not taken for the security of all the claims outside the scope. The mortgage register does not stand in for the offer either. If the register stands, the register is from its own record. If the offer binds that register, the binding is in the sentence of the offer. If there is no sentence, the register does not become the measure of the reduction. If the same creditor has two contracts, each contract is looked for in its own scope sentence. If one was mentioned in the offer and the other was not, the contract that was not mentioned is not written inside the one that was mentioned. If a transfer document passed the claim to a new creditor, the transfer is read as far as it is written in its document. If there is no document, a transfer is not assumed. The transfer does not itself carry the reduction in the offer to the new creditor. The carrying exists if the offer mentions that transfer.
The frame sits on the enforcement and bankruptcy law page. The text of ratification can be asked about from the contact page. The question does not add a measure that is not in the text.
Conclusion
A balance outside the scope does not fall by itself. A reduction inside the scope exists only as far as it was written in the offer. A measure is not invented. A payment slip does not close an item it does not describe. Being written on the list does not build the scope of ratification. Silence is not a waiver. The basis is the provisions of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code No. 2004.