In short
The question of what happens if a character is used on another product opens by reading the good on which the drawing was printed next to the character sheet. This reading is not the short form of a logo debate. The right holder places together the character sheet and the cup, T-shirt, or packaging on which that drawing was printed. The absence of registration does not erase the drawing. If there is a trade-mark registration, a second door stands separately. No rate is in this note.
The drawing and the product stand side by side
The character sheet carries the date of the drawing and to whom it appears to belong. The product photograph shows where the same lines were printed. If the two are missing, the sentence "this is our mascot" stays weak. The drawing document may show in whose hands the sheet stands. While the document is missing, ownership is not announced. The photograph shows which good the print is on. While the photograph is missing, the product claim stays incomplete as well.
The absence of a registered trade mark does not mean the drawing does not stand as a work. If there is a registration, the sign is read as a door separate from the drawing. When the two doors meet on the same cup, they are not pasted together as a single right. A decision is made once the sheet and the product are placed side by side. A small difference in the drawing does not itself end the use. Every resemblance is not itself announced as an infringement either. The overlapping lines are described from the two images.
Changing the name does not erase the print
Changing the character's name may not erase the fact that the drawing was used. Removing the name can also go to the moral side. That side is under a separate heading. If the product photograph stands on a rival site, the image itself can be read separately. The photograph and the character drawing are not pasted together as the same file. If the print still stands on the good even though the name changed, that print is read.
If a business name stands on the back of the product, it may show the person who printed the drawing. If there is no business name, a shelf photograph does not stand in for the manufacturer's name. A petition does not write a factory the photograph does not show. If a contract lists who may print, that list is read. While the contract is missing, it is not said that every print is free, nor that every print is an infringement. The decision is made from the sheet and the product in hand.
Outside the licence list
If a product made under licence does not stand on the licence's list of goods, the print outside the list is read separately. While the list is missing, not every print is treated as an infringement. The list shows which goods appear in the contract. A good that is not on the list is not a silent extension of a good that is. An application or a registration does not take the place of the licence list. The register may show that the sign is registered. The register entry does not erase the drawing sheet.
An invoice may show to whom the good was sold. The invoice is not treated as having assigned the character right. If an assignment is wanted, which right passed stands separately in the contract. A right that does not stand in the contract does not pass on its own because a price was paid. The product packaging is looked at for whether it carries the same lines as the character sheet. If the lines are not there, an infringement is not announced either.
The date on the character sheet shows which drawing the print rests on. If there is no date, the sheet stays incomplete as well. If the lines on the product are not the same as the lines on the sheet, resemblance is not announced. A small departure does not itself end the use. A result is not written before the sheet and the product are placed side by side.
A Çankaya address does not make the character a trade mark
A lawyer in Ankara who asks about the print does not produce a trade mark or a rate from the office's Çankaya address. An office in Çankaya does not stand in for the registry office or the court, and it does not change the competent authority. A district name is not written in place of the character sheet. The competent place is read from the dispute's own rule. The office address does not turn the drawing into a logo debate.
How the sheet is read from the product
If the file, the character sheet, and the print on the product are present, the matter is read from there. The absence of registration is not interpreted as the drawing having been erased. A logo does not stand in for this print either.
Conclusion
In a character file, the place that is looked at is the drawing sheet and the print on the product. The logo note does not stand in for this print. A result is not stated before the sheet and the product are placed side by side. The logo's door is on the logo or copyright page, and unauthorised printing sits under the work was shared without permission. Removing the name is on the moral rights page; the product frame sits under a product photograph, and the frame on the intellectual property page. The basis is the Law on Intellectual and Artistic Works No. 5846 and the Industrial Property Code No. 6769.