In short
A closed visit and an open visit separate the form of contact in a family or relative visit at a prison, and they are not a copy of a meeting with a lawyer. In a closed visit, contact is limited. An open visit is a contact visit on the conditions the institution has written. No visit day is in this note. The day is read from the institution's document. A calendar is not invented while the document is missing.
The rule for a meeting with a lawyer is not read as if it passed automatically to this visit. The two doors are two documents. The decision separates which one was written. A petition does not name a family visit as a meeting with defence counsel. The minute shows who went in. If it does not, the person who entered is not invented.
A visit through glass
A closed visit is a visit made from behind glass or a similar barrier. Contact is as much as that barrier allows. The permission stands in the institution's writing. If there is no writing, contact is not said to be free. The general frame of the visit sits under family visits. That frame does not paste the same day onto every institution. The day is not written into this note either.
What was said is not always put into a minute. If it was, that minute is asked for. If it was not, the content is not added to the petition. The document should show whether the visit took place as closed or open. If it does not, the type is not invented. If the application claims that the type was applied wrongly, it is tied to the institution's writing. While the writing is missing, the claim is not treated as concluded.
A contact visit
An open visit is a visit in which contact is possible on stated conditions. The condition is read from the document of the institution and of the sentence status. If the condition is not written, a contact visit is not assumed. An item handed over during the visit does not change the type of visit. If a ban on items is a separate writing of the institution, that writing is looked for. While the writing is missing, the ban is not widened. A petition does not put the item question in the place of the visit type. The decision keeps the two subjects apart. The document may also show whether the item was taken. Frequency is taken from this document as well. This note does not write the frequency as a day of the week or as an interval. An interval is not invented. The decision takes the document as it stands.
If a discipline note is tied to the open visit not being used, the note itself is looked for. While the note is missing, it is not said that the visit was cut off. If the cut-off is not written, a petition is not built as if it had been written. If notice is the visitor's information, it is kept separately. Notice does not itself change the type of visit. The type stands in the institution's visit document.
The list and the institution's writing
Who the relatives are sits under the visitor list. The list is not a power of attorney. A power of attorney is not a list. A lawyer is not written onto the list as a relative. The identity document is read next to the name on the list. If the names do not match, the mismatch is written. If there is no mismatch, it is said that there is none.
The frame of bans sits under bans on visits. A ban is not treated as applied to every visitor with the same sentence. The ban document should show whom it concerns and for which type of visit it was written. If it does not, the scope is not invented. A petition does not describe a ban that goes past the document. The application goes to the authority the document shows. The authority does not change because of the office's address.
Kept apart from a meeting with a lawyer
A meeting with a lawyer sits under a lawyer at the prison. That meeting is not carried, on its own, into the room of a family visit. A power of attorney does not stand in for the visitor list. The list does not stand in for the power of attorney. The two petitions are written separately. The decision does not melt them into one minute.
Communication by telephone sits under the right to telephone. A telephone call is not put in the place of a closed or open visit. The visit day is not written as the telephone day either. This note states no day. The document separates which right was used. If there is no separation, they are not merged as a single right. If the minute does not show the visit and the telephone on the same line, it is not treated as having done so.
What is separated in open and closed visits
Closed and open visits are family visits, and they are read apart from a meeting with a lawyer. That the office is in Çankaya does not change the authority of the institution where the visit took place; that is read from the document. No visit day is stated. The right to telephone is not put in the place of this visit.
Conclusion
A closed visit and an open visit are the form of contact in a family visit, and they are not a meeting with a lawyer. No visit day is stated. The day is read from the institution's document. The list, the power of attorney, and the minute stand apart. The frame sits on the criminal law page. The basis is the Code of Criminal Procedure No. 5271.