In short
The question of what an order of priority is in enforcement is the list of which creditor the sale price will be written to. The person who attached first is not treated as the owner of the whole price. This record separates the order of pledge, privilege, and ordinary claims. If the complaint day is not in the file, it is not added. The first attachment does not write the price to that creditor of its own accord. A share is not stated without the original schedule.
When the schedule is drawn up
The asset is sold, or money is collected. Expense, the attorney’s fee, and the principal items are read from the file account. If there is more than one creditor, or more than one attachment, the office draws up an order of priority. With a single creditor and a single attachment the schedule can be simpler in practice. Priority of expenses is still looked at. The schedule is not discussed before the sale price enters the cashier.
If the auction has been cancelled, there is no price to distribute. Service of the schedule while an action to set aside is running can confuse the stage. The sale minute shows which price entered the cashier. If there is no minute, a share is not built with an auction figure that is remembered. A request to join does not take the place of the schedule. The request is written separately before the sale. A joining that was not written is not treated as entered on the schedule of its own accord.
What sets the order
The Act gives priority to a secured creditor according to the title or pledge record. An ordinary attachment cannot share the mortgage price on the words “I attached too.” Items such as a labour claim, maintenance, or a public claim can carry a privilege. Privilege is not the same percentage in every file. The nature of the item and the current provision are read. There is no rate in this text. A rate is not invented.
Expenses and enforcement costs stand before the principal claim, or in the place the Act writes. The attorney’s fee is looked at against the tariff and the stage of the file. It can be a separate line on the order of priority. A contract does not, by itself, change whether the claim is ordinary or privileged. The record that changes it is looked for in the schedule line and in the supporting document. The register shows the rank of the pledge. If there is no register, the rank is not built by narration.
What an objection to the schedule aims at
An objection asserts that the order or the amount was written wrongly. Irregularity of the sale is the intention to set it aside. Melting the two in one petition can use up the time at the wrong door. The date of service is the photograph of the objection period. A UYAP summary does not take the place of the return of service. The complaint day is read from the service document and from the text of the provision. If the file has no day, this text does not add a day.
If no objection is made in time, distribution can close in practice. A partial objection aims only at the line that is disputed. Rejecting the whole schedule from memory also delays the line that is sound. An invoice can show that the claim exists. An invoice does not change the order by itself. The decision is not built until the schedule line and the service annotation stand side by side.
How the schedule is read
The order of priority, the sale minute, and the service annotation are read together. An Ankara lawyer separates, from the schedule line, the fact that the office being in Çankaya does not change the competent authority. If the complaint day is not in the file, it is not added to this text.
A share is not built before the schedule stands
The creditor asks, line by line, which rank one is written in, which item carries a privilege, and whether the price is enough. If there is no line, the first attachment is not treated as having taken the whole price. If the price is not enough, the remaining claim can be documented separately. The schedule is not a copy of that document. The creditor who has taken a share follows the remaining item separately. Appearing as if the attachment was released does not erase the right of rank in every file. If the release date and the schedule date conflict, the chain of papers is read.
Setting the auction aside, realising a mortgage, electronic sale, a certificate of insolvency, and a complaint about valuation stand under separate headings. These five headings do not take the place of the distribution schedule. If the complaint day is not written in the file, it is not added. The competent authority is read from the office that drew up the schedule, not from the neighbourhood of the firm. The petition does not melt, in the same sentence, cancelling the sale and disputing the share.
The valuation is the stage before the sale. The schedule is on the price that was realised. If the two stages mix, time ends at the wrong door. The application should aim only at the line that is objected to. A rejection without a target also holds up the line that is sound. The rank of the pledge is read from the register. A rank that is not read does not give an ordinary attachment superiority of its own accord. The decision is not announced as a share while the original schedule is not standing. A rate is not in this text, and it is not added later.
Conclusion
An order of priority is the distribution list of the sale price. It is not a copy of cancelling the auction, or of the myth of the first attachment. If the complaint day is not in the file, it is not added. The frame sits on the enforcement and bankruptcy law page. The basis is in the text of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code No. 2004. A share is not stated without the original schedule.