In short
If an action is filed after the physician has left, the addressee is read from the record on the date of the act. Leaving the job does not erase the note of that date. Today's workplace does not become the addressee of itself. A limitation day is not invented in this article.
The day, the month, and the year are in the article limitation in a malpractice action. The list of opponents is not built again in this text either.
The record on the date of the act
The date of the act is the day on the operation note, the epicrisis, or the intervention form. The physician whose name was written on that day stands on that line after the departure as well. If the line stands, the name that stands is not treated as erased by a resignation or an exit document. The name does not drop from the day of the act because it is not on the institution's staff list of today either. A name that did not drop does not mean the record was never kept.
The record that was kept stands so long as the two copies do not conflict. The conflict is in the article a medical record. This text does not recount the route of taking the departing physician's name out of the record. An exit sentence added later is not carried into the intervention note. A sentence that is not carried does not change the day of the act either.
The name in the intervention record shows the person whose name stood in that act. If there is more than one name, each name stays on its own line. The other names on the list are not erased because the departing physician's name stands on the list. Another name that is not erased is not treated as having undertaken the departing person's act either. Not undertaking it does not produce an equal share either. There is no share in this text.
Law numbered 1219 regulates the practice of medicine. A provision that writes that the departure erased this name is not added to this text. A provision that is not added does not produce a day either. The statute being a frame does not fill the column of the form on the day of the act. The column is read from the paper of that day.
What the departure document does not erase
A resignation, the end of the contract, or the institution's exit writing may show on which day the physician's job with that institution ended. This document does not change the content of the earlier intervention note. A document that does not change it does not take back the hour in the note either. If the trade name, the unit, or the last working day stands in the exit writing, the expression that stands is read. The sentence in the intervention note is not rewritten with this expression.
If there is no day in the exit writing, a day is not invented. A day that is not invented is not put in the place of the date of the act. If the date of the act and the date of exit conflict, the two are left on separate lines. The conflict that is left is not turned into a sentence that no one is left. If the exit appears before the act, this order is written separately. The order is not used in order to erase the name in the note. If it appears after the act, the later day does not close the earlier note backwards.
An account that he left orally does not stand in for the exit writing. If there is no writing, the absence is written. The absence does not mean the physician never worked at that institution. Whether he worked is asked from the record on the day of the act and from the institution's document belonging to that period. If there is no document, today's staff list does not complete the old period.
The handover note is also a record on the date of the act. The departure does not erase the handover hour. The handover hour is read in the article a duty handover. This article does not build that note again. The physician whose name stood at the handover stays on the line of that hour even if he left later. The line that remains is not carried to today's workplace.
The addressee does not come from today's workplace
The place the physician worked after leaving is not the new address of the act. The signboard of the new workplace is not written as an addressee on the old intervention note. The addressee is read from the kind of institution where the act took place, and from the record of that date. The opponent according to the kind of institution is in the article the defendant in a malpractice action. A private hospital, a public hospital, and the physician's own practice are not the same capacity. The capacity is not chosen from the heading of the departure document. It is read from the record of the place where the act took place.
The old institution does not leave the file of itself because the physician left. An institution that did not leave does not mean the physician's personal name is the only addressee in every file. The two capacities are separated in the article on against whom it is filed. The capacity that is separated does not produce an equal share of fault either. The new institution is not treated as having taken over the old act. If a transfer contract stands in the file, that contract is read from its own sentence. If there is no contract, the new institution is not made a party to the old note.
The capacity in the criminal investigation and the party in the compensation action are not the same paper. The departure does not join these two routes of itself. The frame of the routes that are not joined is in the article criminal proceedings and compensation. This page does not choose an offence type. Whom the complaint was directed at is read from the name on the complaint paper. The name is not erased from the complaint because it changed after the departure.
The period is not read from this document
The departure is not written as a day that starts or ends limitation. The day of learning, the day of the act, and the kind of institution are the subject of another article. That subject is under the limitation heading. There is no number of years, months, or days here. A place where there is no number is not closed with a sentence that there is such and such a period after the departure. It is not assumed that the exit date is the same as the date of learning either. An identity that is not assumed does not produce a period calculation either.
The date of the complaint paper is not put in the place of the date of departure. The date of the petition in the action does not change the day of the act either. If three dates stand side by side, all three stay on their own paper. One is not used in order to turn another into a period. A conversion that is not used is not made into a table in this text.
Which province the physician worked in does not choose the running of the period from this page. The province of the new workplace does not carry the authority of the old note of itself. The authority is in the record of the institution where the act took place. The office's address does not change this authority either.
The insurance period and the day of the act
Which period the insurance cover includes is read from the date on the policy. The day of departure does not determine the policy limit of itself. There is no limit figure in this text. If the start day and the end day of the policy stand in the file, those days are put side by side with the day of the act. If the day of the act appears outside the policy interval, this order is written. The order is not closed in a single sentence as cover existing or not existing. An order that is not closed is not completed from the departure document either.
The policy may have been issued in the physician's name. The institution's own insurance may be a separate paper. If there are two papers, both are read. One does not erase the other's limit. A place where the limit is not written is not made into a figure in this text. A place where there is no figure is not used to choose the addressee either. The addressee is read from the record of the act and from the kind of institution. The insurance is not a party that stands in for that addressee. A policy that is not a party does not write, on its own, against whom the action will be filed either.
If the policy is not in the file, the absence is not completed as there being no cover, or as there being cover. An absence that is not completed does not drop the physician's name on the day of the act either.
If the physician worked at more than one institution, each institution's record stays on its own paper. The place where the act took place is read from the note of that place. The staff list of the other institution does not carry the name in this note. A staff list that does not carry it is not added to the list of addressees. A physician who came in the capacity of a consultant and then left enters the same reading. The name in the consultation note stands in that note after the departure as well. The note does not stand in for the principal epicrisis. The epicrisis does not erase the consultant. The two are read side by side. Standing side by side does not produce a share.
The contract being for a fixed term does not erase the record of the act when the term ends. If the end of the term stands in the exit writing, that day is read. If the day of the act is before this day, the earlier note stands. If it is after, the later day does not take back the earlier record. Retirement, resignation, and the end of the contract are not the same provision. Each stands in its own document. The kind of document does not change the sentence of the intervention note. A transfer of the institution, or a change of its signboard, does not erase the name on the day of the act either. If the transfer contract is not in the file, the new signboard is not made the addressee of the old note.
The office in Çankaya does not choose the authority the file will go to.
Conclusion
After the physician has left, the addressee is read from the record on the date of the act. The departure does not erase that record. Today's workplace does not stand in for the old note. There is no period day here. The frame is on the health law page. Law numbered 1219 regulates the practice of medicine. The departure document does not stand in for the intervention record. How the period runs is left to the limitation article. How the departure document and the intervention note are placed side by side can be asked through contact. The question does not carry a promise of a period or of a result. The addressee is not locked without the note being seen.