In short
When the attachment period runs out, the sale does not happen of itself. The running out of the period and the sale request are not the same line. While there is no request annotation, a notice is not treated as issued because the period ended. There is no period figure in this text. The figure is in the article a sale request after attachment, which recounts how the sale is requested. This text does not build that request.
The period line is not the request line
The attachment minutes write on which date the property was attached. The sale request is not a sentence entered of itself under the minutes. The request stands as a separate petition or as an office annotation. If the two records are not side by side, the sale is not treated as having started. The debtor's sentence that the period ran out does not stand in for the request petition. The office does not put the property up for sale at that moment because the period ran out either. The officer's oral warning is not a petition either. If the warning did not pass into the file, it is a nullity.
The order of annotations is read as the attachment minutes, the request if there is one, and the notice if there is one. If the order is broken, the missing link is not treated as completed. If there is more than one item of property, each set of minutes is separate. The period line of one item does not open the sale of the other. If a movable and an immovable stand in the same file, the attachment record of each is on its own line. One's record does not open the other's sale. A message from the creditor's lawyer of "the period ran out, we will put it up for sale" is not a notice. If the message was not annotated in the file, it is a nullity. A note that was annotated does not stand in for the text of the notice either. If the note shows that the request was written, it is read that far.
It is read which property was written in the request petition. If the name of the property is absent, all the property is not treated as put up for sale. If the petition belongs to another file number, it is not this file's request. If the number cannot be read, the number is not completed. A number that is not completed does not build the sentence that the sale opened. If the power of attorney is attached to the petition, the annex is read. If there is no annex, the lawyer is not treated as having built the request of himself. If from whom the request came is not on the line, an attribution is not added.
The notice does not issue of itself when the period ends
The sale notice is a separate text that comes after the request record. If the notice is not in the file, it is not said that there was a sale on the board or in the electronic medium. What the medium is sits under an electronic sale. This text does not repeat that heading. The name of the channel does not turn the period line into the request line. If an old list stands on the screen, the list is not treated as a notice while there is no office annotation. If the annotation and the screen conflict, the annotation is read. While there is no annotation, the screen is not treated as having opened the sale.
The date of the notice is not written as a copy of the date of the attachment. If there is no date on the notice, a date is not added from this text. If the notice belongs to another file number, it is not treated as this file's sale. If the number cannot be read, the number is not completed. If the kind of property is written in the notice text, that kind is read. If it is not, the kind is not treated as carried from the attachment minutes onto the notice. If the block and parcel of the immovable are not on the notice, the notice does not of itself complete the title record. The title record is a separate document. If there is no document, a document is not produced.
If it is written that the notice was suspended or withdrawn, that writing is read. If it is not, it is not said that the sale was made because the notice stands. A notice is not the auction minutes. If there are no auction minutes, the auction is not treated as having happened. If there is more than one notice, each notice is on its own line. An old notice does not stand in for the new notice. If there is no new notice, it is not said that the sale was renewed.
A registry annotation does not mean the sale was made
An attachment annotation on the title, in traffic, or in the registry does not show that the property was sold. While the annotation stands, the sale may not have been requested yet. A writing that the attachment fell, or was lifted, is not a sale notice either. That writing shows not that the property changed hands, but that the attachment record will be read separately. It is not said that the property was sold while there is no writing. While there is a writing, the sale is not treated as made either. The date of the annotation is not the date of the sale. If the date of the sale stands separately in the notice or the auction record, it is read from there.
If the annotation carries another office's file number, it is read apart from this file's attachment. If the file number is written in a mixed way, the annotation is not treated as having turned into a sale before the file number is corrected. The debtor does not take the list on the screen for a sale notice. The list does not stand in for the registry annotation and the office record. If there is more than one annotation, each annotation is read as far as it was written to its own creditor or its own file. If the attribution is not written, the attribution is not completed. An attribution that is not completed does not build the sentence that all the annotations came off.
A pledge, a mortgage, or another limitation is not a copy of the attachment annotation. If that record stands separately in the registry, it is read separately. If it does not, it is not produced from this attachment. The attachment annotation standing does not cause that other record to be treated as put up for sale as well.
A payment document does not erase the period line
Closing the debt before the sale is a separate record. That record sits under paying the debt before the sale. A payment document does not stand in for the sentence that the period ran out. While there is no document, the notice is not treated as having fallen because the debt was paid. If there is a document, the period line is not erased before the document is annotated either. The two are looked for separately in the file. If the amount of the document is written, that amount is read. If it is not, an amount is not added. A fraction and a share are not added either.
A partial payment does not of itself close the cover. If there is a collection annotation on the cover, only the amount deducted in that annotation is read. If there is no annotation, the balance stands. The balance figure is not written into this text. The creditor's word that the debt is over is not a receipt. If the receipt belongs to another file, it is not counted toward this attachment.
If there is a release document, its scope is in the document's own sentence. If there is no sentence, the scope is not widened. A release does not stand in for the sale request. If the request still stands separately, the release is not treated as having erased it. If the erasure was written separately in the file, that writing is read.
The auction minutes do not end the period question
The debtor puts side by side the attachment minutes, the sale-request annotation, and the sale notice. If there is no request annotation, the notice is not looked for either. If all three stand, the sale may have been requested. If there are auction minutes as well, the sale may have reached the auction stage. At that stage the question of whether the period ran out does not stand in for the minutes. It is not said that the auction happened while there are no minutes. Setting aside a finished auction is not the subject of this period. That route sits under setting aside the auction. This text does not build the petition to set it aside.
The price in the auction minutes is not a collection receipt. It is not said that the money was deposited while there is no receipt. If the buyer's name is not in the minutes, a buyer is not added. If the name is there, the name does not mean the debt was erased either. The cover does not close without a collection annotation.
The silence of more than one creditor does not open the sale either. Silence is not a request petition. If there is no request line at all in the file, a notice is not looked for. If one creditor wrote a request and the other did not, the request that was written is read with its own property and its own annotation. A request is not completed in the name of the creditor who did not write. A conversation among the creditors, if it did not pass into an office annotation, is a nullity. If it did pass, the conversation does not turn the period line into the text of the notice either.
A note the debtor kept in a diary or on a phone is not an office record. The note does not build the sentence that the sale opened. If the note and the file conflict, the file is read. If the period line in the file is empty, the note does not fill the gap. A summary the lawyer wrote to the client is not a notice either. If the annotation the summary rests on is not in the file, an annotation is not produced. A page in the annex to the summary that looks as if there was a notice is not treated as the sale having opened before it is confirmed against the office record. If there is no confirmation annotation, the annex does not carry the effect of a notice. The date of the annexed page is not written as a copy of the date of the attachment either. If there is no date, a date is not chosen from this annex. A date that is not chosen is not written as the moment the sale opened either.
If the period figure is not written in the minutes, it is not added. While the annotation on the file copy is read, the office information is on the contact page. While there is no copy of the annotation, a guess that the sale opened, or did not open, is not written. A guess is not the text of a notice.
Conclusion
The running out of the period is not the moment the property was sold. If there is no request line, there is no notice either. A figure is not written into this text. The frame sits on the enforcement and bankruptcy law page. The official basis is the attachment and sale provisions of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law No. 2004.