In short
On an abuse-of-trust charge paper, the claim that the property was delivered is read first. Then the claim that this property was not returned, or was used outside the purpose of the delivery, is looked at. These two lines are separate from the record of deceit in fraud. You do not put a commercial story in the place of the delivery line before seeing it.
Delivery and purpose
The first element of this charge is the writing that the property was delivered for a set purpose. If the purpose stands on the paper as keeping, using, managing, or carrying, that word is read. If the purpose was not written, do not invent a purpose. If there is no delivery, the later sentence of not returning does not on its own build this charge.
Delivery also asks that it be written that the property belongs to someone else. If the line of to whom it belongs is empty, do not add an owner's name. The name of a partnership, or of a workplace, does not stand in for the delivery document. If a document, a receipt, minutes, or a contract is mentioned on the paper, that mention is read. A document that is not mentioned is not treated as existing. If the date of the document and the date of the act differ, both stand. A single day is not built by erasing one.
If the complaint petition says "I gave it in deposit" and the charge paper does not write the delivery, what is read is the charge paper. The word deposit on the petition does not of itself fill the delivery line. The two papers stay side by side. In your statement, you do not have to repeat the petition's word as if it were not on the paper.
Not returning, or use outside the purpose
The second line is the claim that the property that was delivered was not returned. If, in its place, the paper writes that the property was used outside the purpose of the delivery, the act that is read is that sentence. The two acts are not the same word. Whichever the paper writes is read. If both were written, the two lines stand separately. One does not complete the other. How the disposition would be made is not sought.
If a return was made, this fact is looked for in the document. If a receipt, minutes, or a delivery slip shows the return, the document stands beside the claim. If there is no document, do not assume a return. The return does not of itself erase the charge. That the file closed is not drawn from this document either. If a partial return was written, what is partial and what remains are a separate line. If what remains is not on the paper, do not complete it yourself.
Denial is a separate sentence
A claim of denial is the writing that you asserted the delivery never happened. This sentence stands apart from the sentence of not returning. If denial was not written, do not add a denial. If the paper says "he denied it", what is read is that sentence. Your later saying "I do not remember" does not stand in for the denial sentence on the paper. The two accounts are read side by side.
If a correspondence that accepts the delivery and the denial sentence conflict, both stay. The conflict is not turned, at this stage, into a closing in your favour or against you. Defence counsel sees that you do not melt the delivery sentence and the denial sentence into each other in the statement. In the investigation your capacity is suspect. After the indictment is accepted, the capacity of accused does not change the delivery line. If a denial sentence has appeared on the new paper, that sentence is not treated as having been said in the old statement.
A claim line is not delivery
An invoice, a balance, or an unpaid price is not, on its own, property that was delivered. If the paper writes only a claim, this charge is not built from the claim sentence. If a figure is on the paper, it is read. If it is not, do not add a figure. If the item on the invoice and the name of the property that was delivered differ, the two are not treated as the same thing. Which property was delivered is read from the property line.
A compensation account is not part of this reading. If a current-account statement is not mentioned on the paper, do not treat a statement as existing. If it is mentioned, the statement does not stand in for the delivery document. The statement shows a balance. Delivery is a separate sentence belonging to the moment the property was given. In your statement, do not put the balance in the place of the delivery sentence.
The record of deceit is not an element of this paper
A fraud charge discusses that the property was obtained by deceit. The place of those elements is the article the offence of fraud. An abuse-of-trust paper claims that the property was delivered beforehand and was then not returned, or remained outside the purpose. If there is no deceit line, do not add deceit. If deceit was written from the start, that name is not the short name of the delivery charge.
If both names were written in the same papers, the two lines are read separately. The sentence after delivery is not completed as if there had been deceit from the start. Do not join the two names in a single answer. Separate which line you answered. The general frame of the complaint is in the article I was complained of. This page does not copy the steps of that list.
The statement comes after the delivery document
The statement is not opened before the delivery document is read. The preparation is in the article before giving a statement. Do not fill a delivery you do not remember with the purpose the other side expected. Your silence is not a sentence you built in order to deny the delivery. The minutes are read before the signature. A document that did not pass into the minutes is not treated as mentioned by the signature.
A measure given while the delivery claim continues is not a judgment of a duty to return. The measure sits under judicial control. Do not add the kinds of measure to this paper. A word in the measure decision does not change the purpose of the delivery. If a second statement is asked on the same day, first read again the delivery sentence in the first minutes. A purpose that was not in the first minutes is not treated as added later to the second minutes.
On the paper in your hand, separate five things. The name of the property, to whom the delivery was written, which word the purpose is, whether the later sentence is not returning or use outside the purpose, and the return document if there is one. If one of the five is empty, do not fill the gap with the other four. If there is no purpose word, do not take the word "deposit" from the complaint and write it into the charge. If there is no return document, do not produce a receipt from your memory.
A partnership share, or a workplace title, does not stand in for the delivery document. If the title appears on the paper, this does not of itself mean the property was delivered to that title. If the delivery line carries a person's name, the title is not put in the place of the person's name. If there are two names, two lines are read. In your statement, do not put the company's name in the place of property taken in delivery from a person. If the item list on the invoice and the name of the property that was delivered conflict, both stand. Do not patch the conflicting item onto the delivery sentence.
If the file number on the summons paper belongs to another claim file, do not carry the balance on that number into this charge. At the time of signing, separate which document you answered. A commercial story recounted without separating writes into the minutes a purpose that is not on the paper. A purpose that was written does not fall of itself later by "I did not mean that". For that reason the minutes are read with the delivery sentence seen.
If more than one delivery is written, each delivery stands with its own purpose and its own later sentence. A single claim of not returning is not built by joining the deliveries. If there is a return document for one item and not for the other, do not carry the document to the item without a document. If the name deceit appears on only one line, do not spread that name over all the deliveries. If a denial sentence was written for one item, the other item is not treated as denied. In your statement, separate the items. Let which delivery you answered appear in the minutes. A separation that does not appear is not treated as made by the signature. The title of the partnership does not turn the items you did not separate into a single delivery. If a witness says "he took all of them", this word does not cover property that is not written on the delivery line. The witness sentence and the delivery list stay side by side. Do not add property that is not on the list yourself either. An addition stands only if it is entered in the minutes. If the purpose word appears in the witness and is not on the paper, the purpose is not produced from the witness sentence. If a return slip belongs to one item, do not treat the slip as the sentence that the other item was returned. If the date on the slip and the date of the charge differ, keep both dates. If a name is not written on the receipt, do not treat the person on the receipt as the one who took delivery. If the person's name on the slip is empty, do not write the name yourself. An empty name is not put in the place of the person on the delivery line.
Conclusion
An abuse-of-trust paper is read with the claim of delivery and of the later not returning, or of use outside the purpose. A bare debt line is not delivery. Denial is a sentence separate from not returning. Deceit is the subject of a separate offence. The frame is on the criminal law page. Your delivery document may be read together with the file through contact. The basis is the provisions of the Turkish Penal Code No. 5237 and the Criminal Procedure Code No. 5271.