In short
The short-form decision and the reasoned judgment are not the same paper; the period is read from the service line. The short-form decision writes the result. The reasoned judgment is the text whose reasons come afterwards. If the service line is blank, no day is added. The difference between regional appeal and cassation is not explained on this page.
The result sentence stands in the short-form decision
The short-form decision announced as the hearing ends carries the result of the judgment. A conviction, an acquittal, a discontinuance, or another result appears in this text. If a penalty was imposed, the amount may also have been stated here. The reasons are not the whole of this paper. The reasons are written later and served separately. If the result sentence stands on one page and the amount on another page, the two are read separately. If one is missing, the other is not put in its place. If the name of an institution is written beside the amount, the name is carried over as it stands in the short-form decision. A sentence-enforcement office is not chosen when the name is absent.
Announcement of the short-form decision does not mean the judgment has become final. The annotation of finality is separate. It is not said to have become final while that annotation is absent. A result announced in absence does not remove this distinction either. Whether a judgment was constituted in the defendant's absence is in the article the defendant's absence. This page does not recount that constitution again. The court and the file number are looked for in the heading of the short-form decision. If the number does not match the number on the hearing summons, the mismatch is not hidden. A number that does not match is not used as the start of the period.
If the short-form decision was written inside the minutes, it is noted on which page of the minutes it stands. If there is no page number, it is said that there is none. The line in the minutes that the defendant was present, or absent, is separate from the result sentence. The presence line does not mean the reasons were served. Service is the annotation on the reasoned text.
The service line is not a note of pronouncement
Pronouncement is the note in the minutes of an explanation made face to face at the hearing. Service is the annotation that the reasoned text reached you or your defence counsel. The dates of the two notes do not have to be the same. They are not filled in as if they were the same. The hearing day is not made the start while the service line is blank. If the pronouncement note contains an hour, that hour is the hour of the explanation. That hour is not the day the reasoned text was served. The two lines are written separately in the petition.
If you were not in the courtroom, a pronouncement note in your own name is not looked for either. An hour read out to someone else's face is not your service. If the minutes say it was pronounced to the defendant, that sentence is read together with the name the sentence goes with. If there is no name, pronouncement is not treated as made to everyone. In electronic service as well, the place to be read is the record line. If there is no line, a message screen is not made into the day of service. When the line is there, the day is not added from this article. A "read" mark on the screen is not a service annotation if the record line is not standing there.
Which route ran from that day depends on the difference between regional appeal and cassation. The difference is in a separate article. The course of the regional court of justice review in Ankara is in a separate article; the authority on this paper is the court in the heading of the short-form decision. This text does not write the limit of review or a number of days. The number of days is not added beside the service line. If the line is blank, a start is not added either.
A reasons petition is not written while there are no reasons
A long petition drawn up before the reasoned text arrives debates a reason that does not yet exist. The short-form decision states the result. It does not state the reason. Speaking about the reason is possible after the reasoned paper has been served. A paragraph of a text that has not been served is not invented from this page. If a few pages of the reasoned judgment have arrived, and the result section or the evidence section is missing, the missing section is not treated as completed. The missing page is written in the margin of the page in hand. If there is no number in the margin, the gap is shown by the page count.
If the short-form decision in hand states an amount, the amount is read from there. If it does not, an amount is not added. The assessment of the evidence in the reasons is not completed from the short-form decision either. The completion is on the reasoned text's own page. A list of errors is not written as settled before the page arrives. If no item of evidence is named in the short-form decision, the name is not carried over from another record in the file as if it were the reasons. The carrying over is done after the reasoned text is served, and with the sentence in that text. If the text does not discuss an item of evidence, it is not written as if it had been discussed.
If the reasoned text has been served, the petition writes the page and the sentence of the paragraph under discussion. If the sentence is long, it is shortened. The shortening does not produce an acceptance that is not in the text. A sentence that the court accepted such and such is not built if those words do not stand in the reasons. The cover of the reasoned judgment and the inner pages may not carry the same result. If the cover and an inner page conflict, the petition places the two pages side by side. Where there is no conflict, the cover is not read on its own as the reasons in place of the inner page. If the inner page has not arrived, the cover does not make the reasons count as complete. The service annotation on the cover is still an annotation even when an inner page is missing. The annotation does not complete the missing page. The gap is written separately. If the result in the short-form decision and the result in the reasoned judgment stand in different words, the difference is not hidden. Which words are the operative provision is read from the judgment heading of the reasoned text. If there is no heading, the two results are left side by side. One is not selected in place of the other. If the amount under the judgment heading is not the same as the amount in the short-form decision, the two amounts are written side by side. One is not selected by deleting the other. If the amount line is blank, the blank is not filled from the other paper.
Preserving the period does not change the result
If an explanation made face to face was entered in the minutes, waiting for the reasoned text may not of itself put the intent on the record. In that case a short petition may be given to the court. The petition writes the file number, the day the short-form decision was announced, and that the legal remedy will be used. It adds that the reasons will be submitted when the reasoned judgment is served. This paper is called a petition to preserve the period. If the explanation was not entered in the minutes, the petition cannot be dated as though a pronouncement that never entered the record existed. The date is the day read in the minutes. If the day cannot be read, no day is added.
Preserving the period is not a judgment. It is not the reasoned judgment. It cannot be said beforehand that it saved the period. Whether it did depends on the pronouncement line or the service line, and on the condition in the statute. If the condition is not on the paper, the petition is not treated as having completed the condition. The petition is not treated as having chosen the name of the route either. The name of the route is read from the kind of short-form decision and from the statute. That reading is not done on this page. The date of the petition is not chosen before the name and the date on the line are read together. The day the petition reached the court, if there is one, is read from the receipt line. If there is no receipt line, the day of arrival is not written in place of the day of pronouncement.
If a petition to preserve the period was filed, and the reasoned judgment was served afterwards, the reasoned petition on the legal remedy is a separate paper. The second paper is not pasted in the place of the petition that preserved the period. Both may stand in the file. The date of the second paper is not written as earlier than the service annotation. While there is no annotation, the second paper is not dated on the footing that it was filed after service. If the short-form decision says acquittal or discontinuance, preserving the period does not turn that result into a conviction. If it says conviction, the petition does not add an amount that is absent from the short-form decision. The contact page stands for the paper itself. A contact record does not stand in for the service annotation.
The lawyer's annotation does not stand in for the defendant's
Service on the lawyer and service on the defendant may be separate lines. Which line is your date is read from the name on the annotation. If there is no name, someone else's date is not borrowed. If the representative's name stands on the annotation, that annotation is service made on the representative. If there is no separate annotation in the defendant's own name, the representative's date is not copied as the defendant's date. If there are two annotations, the two dates are written side by side. The earlier one does not of itself move into the place of the later one. Which of them is taken as the basis for the start of the legal remedy is read from the capacity on the annotation and from the condition in the statute. The condition is not converted into a number of days on this page.
If counsel has changed, service issued to the former counsel is not the new counsel's annotation. If the new counsel's name is not on the service slip, the slip is not treated as issued in that name. If the defendant appears without defence counsel, a blank counsel line does not also mean that there was never any service. If service stands on a separate slip in the defendant's name, that slip is read. If the slip is absent, it is said to be absent. The frame is on the criminal law page.
Conclusion
Whether the paper in hand carries the result or the reasons is separated by its heading. A date is not started by being written onto a blank service line. A note of pronouncement is not renamed as a service annotation. The lawyer's annotation is not made the defendant's date while the defendant's annotation is missing. The name of the route is not chosen in this distinction. The basis is the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code No. 5271 on announcement and service of the decision.