In short
Giving a medicine without asking about pregnancy is the claim that pregnancy was not asked about when the prescription was written, or that a warning was not written even though pregnancy was known. Not every medicine used in pregnancy is fault of itself. This text does not draw up a list of prohibited medicines. There is no dose, amount, or statistic. The patient asks for the pregnancy sentence in the examination note and the name of the medicine on the prescription.
A mix-up of the medicine inside the hospital is a separate matter. A sentence on the package leaflet is not treated as if it automatically passes into that day's question note. If there is no note, it is not said that the question was asked, and it is not said that it was not. A document is not written up as a conclusion without separating the two possibilities. The petition does not add a sentence that is not in the note.
Does the question remain in the note
If a sentence that the patient is not pregnant, or the date of the last period, was written, the question may have been asked. If there is no line, a failure to ask is not distinguished from the patient not having said anything. If the patient claims to have said she was pregnant and that the physician did not note it, the two statements conflict. The conflict is read against the record dated with the prescription. The file is requested through the patient file. A sentence on the medicine box does not stand in for that day's question.
The chain of a wrong administration in hospital sits under medication error. This text separates where the pregnancy information sits on an outpatient prescription. Whichever door the application goes through, the document for that door is attached. A decision does not put an in-hospital mix-up in the place of the prescription note. A dose is not written into this distinction.
The picture that follows the warning
A medicine may be one that can be used in pregnancy, or one that should be avoided. Which medicine was inadvisable at that moment is a medical question. This text does not answer that question with a list. The total absence of a warning is not a finding that the medicine caused harm. The picture that appears in the baby or the mother may also meet the birth file. That file sits under harm at birth. A meeting of the two is the two documents coming side by side. It is not a finding on its own.
Treating the diagnosis as some other illness rather than pregnancy sits under misdiagnosis. Explaining the risk is related to informed consent. A prescription is not consent to surgery. The consent paper is not pasted in place of the pregnancy question. The record may show whether the warning was passed on orally or in writing. If it does not show that, the warning is not treated as passed on. An amount and a statistic are not added to this picture.
The pharmacy paper
The pharmacist's warning paper does not show that the physician failed to ask. If there are two papers, both are kept. The patient does not throw away the medicine box or the copy of the prescription. If the box is gone, a copy of the prescription is requested. An invoice may show the name of the medicine and the place it was obtained. An invoice is not the legal measure of the dose. There is no dose in this text. If the name on the invoice conflicts with the name on the prescription, the conflict is written down. If there is no conflict, it is said that there is none.
If there is a contract or an information form, that too is read on its own. The form may not be a copy of the examination note. The petition does not put the form in the place of the note. The decision separates which paper is the record of which day. The day is the date on the document. This text does not write a further period. An application is not treated as concluded before the missing paper is completed.
The name on the prescription and the later document
The name of the medicine is read on the prescription. If the name is missing, a name is not invented. A later examination note may say that the medicine was stopped or continued. If it does not say so, it is not said that it was stopped. The dates of the two notes are kept. The earlier note does not erase the later picture. The later note does not mean that the earlier question was never asked. Whichever of the two the document carries is what is read.
If service is a writing from a board or a court, that writing does not stand in for the prescription. The prescription does not stand in for the service either. The petition attaches the two separately. An amount is not the name of the picture that appeared. A statistic is not produced from a single file. A dose is not copied into this text from the box. A decision is not reached while the prescription in hand and the question note are absent.
What is separated in a medicine given in pregnancy
Not every medicine used in pregnancy is fault. The question note is read from the prescription. A dose, a compensation amount, and a statistic are not written. An in-hospital mix-up is not put in the place of this prescription.
The office in Çankaya does not choose the authority the file will go to.
Conclusion
A claim about medicine in pregnancy is read from the question note and the prescription. Not every medicine in pregnancy is fault. There is no prohibited list, dose, amount, or statistic. An in-hospital mix-up is a separate matter. The frame sits on the health law page. The basis is Law No. 1219.