In short
The question of whether a right arises, if my idea was taken and there is no registration, is read from the place where a bare idea does not of itself produce a right. Protection looks at which mould the idea entered. A concrete expression can be a work. The appearance of a product can be a design, a technical solution an invention, a commercial sign a trademark, and information that is kept secret a trade secret. If none of these is filled, a sentence of "it was taken" does not produce a register right or a copyright. The period of misappropriation, and a year, are not in this article.
An idea recounted freely at a meeting can also cease to be a secret. The exit is not measured by a number of years. An exit that is not measured is read from dated correspondence. If there is no correspondence, the scope of the account is not assumed. A scope that is not assumed is not written into the petition as a right.
Which mould is discussed
A work can arise when it is created. Registration is not a condition of the work. The frame itself stands in the copyright record. For an appearance, registration, or a first presentation to the public, is discussed. That route stands in the registration of an industrial design record. Whether a technical solution will be a patent or a secret is separated before disclosure. The distinction is not this page's table of years. The table is not in this text.
If a drawing, a text, or a note stands, the mould can shift to the side of a work. If it does not stand, a bare business idea is not announced as a work. An idea that is not announced is not read as if an application had been made either. If there is an application, the register entry shows it. While there is no entry, a registration is not treated as existing. A registration that is not treated as existing does not start a period of misappropriation either.
Recounting is not an assignment
Recounting an idea does not mean giving the other side permission to use it. Recounting does not turn the idea into a right either. Information that was shared on a condition of confidentiality, and that has commercial value, can stay in the regime of a secret. The conditions stand in the trade secret record. Information recounted without a condition weakens a later sentence of "it was secret". Dated correspondence shows what was recounted, and whether there was a record of confidentiality.
If the contract writes a permission to use, the permission is limited to that sentence. If there is no sentence, the account is not a document of assignment. An account that is not a document does not appear on the register as an assignment of a right. An assignment that does not appear is not said to tie the other side's product to you of itself either. The tie is built with the papers that show which item belongs to whom.
The record of confidentiality
The note of the meeting carries who said what, and whether the confidentiality clause was read. If there is no clause, the note is not a contract of secrecy. If there is a note, the scope of the clause is on that page. The scope does not of itself take in every part of the later product. A part that was not taken in is described separately. While there is no description, the whole product is not written as a breach of secrecy.
A paper given by hand may not carry the same sentence as an email. Two documents that do not carry it are not joined as a single assignment. A record that is not joined stands in the petition in order of date. The order does not invent a number of years. A year that is not invented is not put in place of the period of misappropriation either.
The rule of honest practice is a separate door
If a trademark, a design, or a work does not arise, the rule of honest practice in commercial law can be read separately. That reading is not a copy of an industrial right. The frame stands in the unfair competition record. A misleading product identity, and a bare business idea, are not dissolved in the same file. The right holder separates which document is found for which item.
If the decision was reached on the point of honest practice, the ruling is in that decision. While there is no decision, a sentence of competition does not produce a trademark registration. A sentence that does not produce it does not stand in for an application to the register. The application is a separate record. The record and the court petition are not the same paper.
If the date of the drawing and the date the product came out conflict, the place of the conflict is read from the correspondence. If the correspondence is silent, the order is not invented. An order that is not invented does not start the period of misappropriation either. A period that has not started does not produce a number of years either.
Where the mould is separated
No period of misappropriation, and no year, is written onto a bare idea. A lawyer in Ankara reads from the document that the office being in Çankaya does not choose the court that will examine the work. The competent authority is not established while the contract, the register, and the service are still outstanding. An authority that is not established is not completed from the office address.
Conclusion
An idea does not give rise to a right before it becomes concrete as a work, an appearance, an invention, a sign, or secret information. The period of misappropriation, and a year, are not in this text. The frame is on the intellectual property page. The basis is the Law on Intellectual and Artistic Works and the Industrial Property Code.