In short
A statement at the police is an account given at a police unit, and it is not a copy of the session at the public prosecutor's office. Minutes before the police or the gendarmerie are not read as the public prosecutor's minutes. There is no promise of an outcome. The day of custody and the prison term are not fixed in this text. An account given after coming on a summons, and an account during custody, are not the same envelope. The question of how a statement is given at the police is read from which authority kept the minutes.
In which capacity the person was summoned
A complaint, a report, custody, or a summons to the station can be the reason for the account. Capacity is read from the summons paper or from the heading of the minutes. The capacity of suspect, witness or complainant is not written in place of another. If the capacity has changed, the earlier minutes do not of themselves become void. If two capacities are mixed on the same paper, the mix is stated separately. If there is no service of the summons, whether the person came of their own wish is looked for in the sentence in the minutes. If there is no sentence, the manner of coming is not invented.
Custody is not a condition of every account at the police. A statement given after coming on a summons can also be kept without a custody record. If there is custody, it is not completed by writing a number of days. If the day is not in the file, it is not here either. The prison term is not written. An account to the police is not a conviction. Even if the minutes were signed, the judgment is read from the court's decision.
The rights appear in the minutes
Silence, defence counsel, and reading the minutes are also spoken of in an account to the police. These three are read not as a brochure sentence, but by whether they appear in the minutes. If defence counsel was asked for, it is looked for whether the request was entered in the minutes. If the person stayed silent, the silence should be written too. A spoken sentence of "I told them" does not stand in for the line in the minutes. If a signature was made before the minutes were read, that fact stands separately. The signature does not of itself prove that the content is accurate. The content is read line by line.
Sending the account on to the public prosecutor's office does not turn the police minutes into a statement to the public prosecutor. The second authority keeps separate minutes. The first paper is not pressed into service as a draft of the second session. If there is a contradiction, the two documents are placed side by side. Which was kept at which time comes out of the paper's own time. If there is no time, a time is not invented.
If the question in the minutes and the answer do not stand on the same line, the two are matched. If there is no question, it can remain unclear which subject the answer relates to. The uncertainty is not closed as an outcome against the person. An outcome is not built in this text. If the officer's name is written under the minutes, it is read from there. If it is not written, a name is not invented. If there is more than one signature, each signature stands apart. If one of the signatures is missing, the missing one is stated separately. A missing signature does not of itself strike out the whole account. It is read together with the other documents. If what was asked of the person and what was entered in the minutes differ, the difference is written. If a note added later has no time, the time of the addition is not invented.
The account of a person who came in the capacity of a witness is not carried into a suspect's minutes. A complainant's account is not read as the suspect's sentence either. The three capacities can be present in the same event. Each stands in its own minutes. One person's silence does not erase the other's account. A complaint petition is a document separate from the police minutes. If the two conflict, both remain in the file. The contradiction is not closed by writing a prison term. The term is still not there. Service shows which unit summoned the person. If the unit is written differently in the minutes, both are stated, and one is not deleted.
How an account to the police is read
The service of the summons, the police minutes, and, if there is one, the request for defence counsel stand in the same file. The three are not treated as a single page. A lawyer in Ankara does not write the address of the Çankaya office in place of the station or the public prosecutor's office. The competent authority is read from the unit on the summons and in the minutes. The minutes are not closed so that the account will pass of itself. The district of the office does not change the place where the statement will be taken. The day of custody and the prison term are not written under this heading either. A period is read from the minutes or the summons only if it is written there. If it is not written, it is not added.
Neighbouring accounts
The police and the public prosecutor's office are not the same session. The distinction is under the difference of statements, preparation before a statement is under before a statement, defence counsel is under defence counsel at the police, and a summons to the station is under a summons to the station. These four do not repeat how the police minutes are read. Each looks at its own document.
Conclusion
The answer to how a statement is given at the police is the police minutes. It is not a copy of the session at the public prosecutor's office. The day of custody and the prison term are not invented. The frame is on the criminal law page, and the basis is in the text of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Law No. 5271. A route is not chosen before the service, the minutes and the petition are seen. A signature does not build an outcome on its own.