In short
An assault report and a forensic medical report are not the same paper; one does not stand in for the other. A hospital or emergency-department paper records the examination at that attendance. A forensic medical report is the document of a separate examination. Neither is a court judgment. This page does not build a medical diagnosis, and it does not write the sentencing band of the offence of wounding. How the document entered the investigation file is in the article on how a public prosecutor's investigation works.
The hospital paper carries that day's examination
The paper the public calls an assault report is, for the most part, an examination note drawn up at a hospital or in an emergency department. The note carries the finding the physician saw at that attendance, and the event the person told, in the form in which it was written. The note does not rule on by whom the wounding was committed. A diagnosis that is not written on the paper is not added from this page. If there is a sentence of a finding in the document, the sentence is read from the document. If it is not in the document, the finding is not produced on this page.
The separation is read from the name of the institution in the heading of the paper. The name of a hospital or an emergency department is not written in place of the name of a forensic medicine institution. If the two institutions are not on the same document, the document is the paper of the institution in its heading. Adding the name of an institution by hand on top does not change the person who drew it up. The date of the paper, the time, and the name of the person who drew it up stand in the heading. The name of forensic medicine is not written on the document before the heading is read. The person should not later add, on top of the paper, the event they told during the examination. An added sentence looks like the physician's note. If the account is to change, the change stands apart as a new statement.
The examination may have been carried out after the day of the event. The day of the event and the day of the examination are written separately. The gap between them is not filled with a finding that is not in the report. If the paper says that it is a provisional record, this word does not mean the document is of no effect. It is the record of the finding seen that day. It does not carry a promise of a final assessment. If your name, your date, or the line on which the event was told was written wrongly on the paper, the correction is asked for from the institution that drew it up, or by a new statement, and not by scribbling on the document. A scribble looks as if it erased the physician's sentence.
A forensic medical report issues in a separate channel
A forensic medical report is a separate document drawn up in a forensic medical examination. The examination can come onto the agenda at the request of the public prosecutor or the court, or with a later examination. A forensic medical report does not issue of itself in every event. If there is a request, or a later examination, that document stands separately. The report is not obtained by writing "forensic" on the first paper. A photocopy does not change the person who drew it up. Taking the first paper to a forensic medicine institution does not make that paper a forensic medical report. If the institution carries out its own examination, a new document comes into being.
The date of the report can differ from the date of the first examination. The difference does not leave the first paper of no effect. The two dates are read side by side in the file. If the date was erased, the date is not completed from this page. The report can later enter in the record a finding that could not be seen at the first examination. The later finding does not have the first attendance counted as not having happened. The complaint written at the first attendance is not erased either because it was not repeated in the later report. The two texts are the record of their own day.
If a summons for the examination arrived, the day and the place in the summons are read from the paper itself. While there is no summons, this page does not write an appointment day. When you go to the examination, a copy of the earlier hospital paper can stand beside you. The copy does not determine in advance the sentence of the new report. A sentence is not prepared for the physician of the kind that this result should be written in the report. The complaint that was seen, and the old paper in hand, are shown. The result is the text of the person who carries out the examination.
The two documents are not put in each other's place
If there are two documents in the file, both stand with their own date and the person who drew them up. The later examination is not read as if it could erase the finding at the first attendance. The first paper is not put in place of the forensic medical assessment either. If there is a conflicting sentence, the conflict is dealt with by reading the documents side by side. When one is discarded, the other does not become a judgment on its own. Which sentence will be preferred, and why, is the work of the public prosecutor or the court. The person does not close the conflict by asking that one of the papers in their hand be taken out of the file.
The person places the paper in their hand on the list of evidence of the complaint. They do not change the physician's sentence in their own handwriting. A photograph can be separate evidence. The photograph does not correct the line of the report. If the day the photograph was taken differs from the day of the report, the two days are written side by side. An arrow, writing, or a crop is not added onto the photograph later. A later attendance at hospital is a third paper. The third paper does not stand in for the first note. All three can stay in the file. The general place of a health document is within the frame of how a victim's rights are used.
In the complaint petition the name of the report is written with the institution in its heading. Calling a hospital paper a forensic medical report leads the authority to look for the wrong document. If the document has not yet issued, it is written that it has not issued. The sentence of a report that will issue is not added to the petition in advance. If the report arrives later, the further petition states which investigation number it was placed on, and which fact it meets. If there is no number, the day of the first complaint is written.
A sentence of a finding does not choose a sentencing band
The finding in the report does not choose, on this page, the sentencing band of the offence of wounding. The short description the physician used is not the length of imprisonment itself. The name of the offence is the characterisation of the public prosecutor and the court. The characterisation is not produced on this page from one sentence of the report. An expression that looks simple, and a heavier result, are read together with all the documents in the file. A single adjective does not lock the name of the offence on its own. This page does not turn those adjectives into years of a sentence.
The event can be told while there is no report too. The report does not stand in for the complaint. The complaint does not stand in for the report either. The two are separate papers. The diagnosis sentence of the report is not added to the complaint petition while it is not in the document. If it is in the document, the sentence stands as it is. A sentence that stands as it is is not turned into the amount of the sentence. The pain the person felt can be told in the petition as a complaint if it is not written in the report. The complaint is not presented as the physician's finding. The two sentences stay apart.
A health paper in an accident file carries the same separation
If the injury is in a traffic accident, the frame of the criminal file is in the article on the criminal file after an accident. The hospital paper taken in the accident, and the forensic medical examination, each stand with their own heading. One does not stand in for the other. A head of compensation, insurance, and a rate of fault are not calculated inside this separation. A health paper can enter the criminal file as evidence. Its entering does not mean that an action for compensation was brought. The accident minute does not change the physician's sentence. The physician's sentence does not rewrite the fault line in the accident minute either.
A blow received at a workplace, or at a school, is subject to the same separation of documents. The place where the event occurred does not of itself change the type of the report. The type is read from the name of the institution that drew it up. If there is more than one injured person, each person's paper carries their own name. Placing someone else's report in your own file, as if your name were written on it, does not make the document yours.
The name and the date are checked before it is placed in the file
Before it is added to the complaint, it is looked at whether your name, the date, and the institution that drew it up can be read on the paper. If someone else's name stands there, the paper is not your examination. If the name is wrong, the correction is asked for from the institution that drew it up, and not by scribbling in the margin of the document. If the date cannot be read, a date is not invented. A date that cannot be read is written in the petition as unknown. Saying unknown is not inventing the event. It is showing that the record of that day stayed incomplete.
If there was more than one examination, each paper stands with its own annex number. Fitting all of them onto a single page can erase the name of the institution. A copy on which the name of the institution was erased does not show which is the hospital and which is forensic medicine. A legible copy is kept. If a stain or a fold mark covers a sentence, the covered sentence is not completed by guesswork. The part that was told during the examination and did not pass onto the paper is said separately in the complaint minute. The complaint minute is not put in place of the physician's sentence. The physician's sentence does not lead you to write a movement you did not see as if you had seen it either. If the two texts conflict, the conflict is not hidden.
Conclusion
An assault report and a forensic medical report are separate documents. One carries that day's examination, and the other a separate examination. One does not stand in for the other. Two papers that conflict stay side by side in the file. A medical diagnosis and a sentencing band for wounding are not on this page. The frame is on the criminal law page. There is a contact route for the person who drew up the paper in hand. The basis of the procedure is the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, Law No. 5271.