In short
No. The creditor giving up the sale is not counted as having lifted the attachment. Giving up takes back the request for sale, or the sale date that was fixed. The attachment annotation stands without a lifting writing. The routes of lifting are in the article on lifting an attachment. This text does not put the petition of giving up on the same line as those routes. A period is not written into this text.
The request for sale is not the annotation itself
After the attachment is placed, the sale is requested separately. Turning back from the sale that was requested does not mean the attachment was never placed. If the minute stands, the annotation stands. Taking down the text of the announcement does not tear the minute. The announcement and the minute are kept apart. If the list of property in the announcement is narrower than the one in the minute, the attachment on property that is not on the list is not treated as having fallen together with the announcement. For property that is in the announcement and not in the minute, the sale is not treated as completed without a minute either.
If more than one item of property was attached, giving up the sale of one does not erase the annotation of the other. Each item is read from its own minute line. If there is no line, giving up is not built for that item either. The annotation on an immovable is not the sale announcement. That distinction is under attachment of an immovable. The annotation on a vehicle is not the auction itself either. The vehicle record is under attachment of a vehicle. This text does not tell the two registries again. What it tells is that taking the request for sale back does not erase the annotation in that registry.
If the request for sale was made for one item, and the attachment also stands on other items, giving up looks only at the item that is the subject of the request. If the subject is not written in the petition, the sale of all the items is not treated as taken back. The annotation of an item that was not written stays in place.
Giving up is not a waiver
Giving up the sale is not waiving the proceedings. A waiver is not continuing the proceedings, and it is in the article on waiver of the proceedings. A creditor who turns back from the sale is not counted as having left the claim and the proceedings. What they left is the request for sale at that moment. The remaining claim can stand in the file. A claim that stands is not read as if it had been zeroed at the end of the petition of giving up. If there is a zero line, whether this line is a waiver endorsement or another step is read from the cover. If there is no cover, a zero is not invented.
Postponing the sale date is not giving up either. Postponement shifts the date. Giving up pulls the request back. Neither is a lifting petition. The file being taken out of process is not the same record as these two lines either. That record is under a file taken out of process. The screen of being taken out of process does not have the sale petition counted as a lifting. If the screen writes both that it was taken out of process and that the sale was given up, the two endorsements stand apart. One does not mean the other lifted the attachment.
The authority of the representative to give up the sale can be looked for separately in the power of attorney. If there is no authority line, the principal creditor's signature is requested. An unauthorised petition is not counted as having lifted either the annotation or the sale. Papers waiting for a signature do not appear as if the sale date had been deleted. Deletion is the endorsement on the office record.
The falling line is entered separately
The statute can tie the result that the attachment falls to the sale not being continued. This result does not erase the annotation at the moment the petition of giving up is written. The line on which the falling was entered is separate. If the period is not in the file, a line is not invented. A falling that was not entered does not have the bank or the land registry written that it has been lifted. A falling that was entered is not counted as having dropped the annotation before it is written on the registry either. If the registry extract is annotated, the falling line does not beat the extract. If the extract is clean, the falling is matched with the minute as to which item it belongs to. If there is no match, it is not said that all the items were cleaned.
If the auction was held and concluded, a later petition of giving up does not of itself set the auction aside. Setting it aside is the subject of a separate complaint. This text does not build that complaint. If the date of the auction minute and the date of the petition of giving up contradict each other, which came first is read from the papers. If there are no papers, an order is not assumed. Whether the minute became final is not in this text as a period either. Finality is read from the endorsement in the file. If there is no endorsement, giving up is not counted as having taken the minute back.
The creditor can request the sale again later. The period the request is tied to is not written into this text. The period is read from the record in the file. If there is no record, a period is not added. Requesting again does not make the earlier giving up a lifting of the attachment. The new request is not a writing that erases the old annotation if the old annotation stands. If the annotation has fallen, a new sale does not of itself bring the fallen annotation back. Coming back depends on the attachment record being entered again. That entry is not built step by step in this text.
A message is not a lifting writing
The creditor's message that they gave up the sale produces no result before it enters the enforcement office. While there is no office record, the bank or the land registry does not count a printout of the message as a lifting. A lifting is the lifting writing being entered at the institution. Before the writing goes, the screen is not treated as changed. The institutions' internal workflow is not listed in this text. The debtor passing the message to the creditor does not take the place of the office record either. The record is the petition being entered with the reference number.
The documents that are read are the request for sale, the petition of giving up and the attachment minute. If the petition of giving up does not write that the attachment should be lifted, the petition is not counted as a lifting request. Writing the two requests on the same paper does not make them a single line either. The result of each request is looked for separately in the file. If the petition of giving up and the attachment minute stand, the distinction is made from those two papers through contact. The distinction does not produce a lifting writing. A short sentence in an electronic message does not complete the list of property in the petition. If there is no list, it is not guessed from the sale of which item a turn was made.
One creditor's message does not drop the sale request of the other creditor in the same file. The other's request stands in their own petition. If there is no petition, the message does not have that request counted as existing either.
A valuation does not erase the annotation
A valuation taken in preparation for the sale does not disappear with giving up. The valuation report is not the document that the attachment was lifted. If the report stands, preparation for sale may have been seen. Preparation does not mean the annotation has fallen. If a turn was made from the sale of one item and a valuation stands for another item, each item is read from its own papers. A single report is not counted as having lifted the attachment of all the items. The amount in the report is not written into this text. If the amount is in the report, it is read from there and is not taken for the amount of the annotation.
An objection to the valuation is not giving up either. The objection discusses how the amount will be read. It does not discuss whether the annotation will fall. If the creditor turns back from the sale before the objection is concluded, the objection papers do not become a lifting writing. The sale that was turned from and the objection file are kept apart. If the sale announcement has been taken down and the valuation report stands, the report is not put in the place of the announcement. The announcement being taken down is not the record that the annotation has fallen.
If the sale announcement issued once and was later taken down, the text that was taken down leaves being an annex of the attachment minute. Leaving being an annex does not tear the minute. The debtor does not drop the annotation by taking the taken-down state of the announcement to the registry. The registry changes when it sees a lifting writing. The writing should concern the lifting of the attachment, not that the announcement was taken down. If a writing about the announcement does not carry a lifting line, the annotation stands.
If there are two requests for sale in the same file, turning from one does not drop the other. The request that falls is distinguished by the reference and the property being stated in the petition. A request that is not stated does not of itself enter the scope of the sentence of giving up. Whether it entered is read from the list of property in the office endorsement. If there is no list, it is not assumed that both requests have fallen. A request that is not assumed stands on its own announcement and minute line.
If a request for sale was never made, there is no request to give up either. The attachment minute can still stand in this case. A minute that stands is not treated as having fallen of itself because there is no request. The registry is not cleaned before the falling is entered on a separate line. The debtor does not take a file printout showing that sale was not requested to the institution like a lifting writing. The institution does not delete the attachment notification without a lifting writing. If the printout and the minute contradict each other, the contradiction is not made the ground for dropping the annotation.
If the printout does not write for which item sale was not requested, it is not said that there is no sale for all the items. Each item's minute stands apart. An item whose minute stands is not announced as without an annotation by the silent sentence on the printout.
Conclusion
Giving up the sale is not a petition to lift the attachment. The annotation stands separately. The registry is not treated as cleaned before the falling is entered. A period and an amount are not written. The framework is on the enforcement and bankruptcy law page. The basis is the sale and attachment provisions of Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code No. 2004.