In short
If the creditor does not request the sale, the attachment does not of itself fall from the file. Not requesting the sale does not lift the attachment at once. The absence of a sale petition is not a lifting endorsement. There is no figure in this text for how long it will stay. The figure is in the article on a request for sale after attachment. This text does not copy that guide. An oral postponement does not erase the attachment either.
The absence of a sale petition is not a lifting
The sale-request line is looked for in the file. If there is no line, the creditor may not yet have requested the sale. Not requesting does not remove the attachment minute. If the minute stands, the attachment record stands. If there is no minute, an attachment is not assumed either. An attachment that is not assumed is not written as a lifted attachment either. An empty request box does not produce a lifting endorsement. A lifting is a separate step that writes that the attachment on the property was lifted. While there is no step, it is not said that the attachment was lifted.
The date of the request petition is not the date the attachment was lifted. If there is no date, a date is not added. The property the petition writes is the property that is read. If there is no property name, it is not completed as all the property having gone to sale or not having gone. If movables and immovables stand in the same file, the request line of each is looked for separately. One line being empty does not erase the other's request. If the representative's signature is on the petition, the signature does not mean the debt has ended. The signature is not an acknowledgement of the debt if there is no release sentence written separately. If there is no release sentence, the absence is not counted as acceptance.
If the petition was withdrawn, the withdrawal should be written separately in the file. If there is no writing, a withdrawal is not assumed. Even if there is a withdrawal writing, the withdrawal does not of itself lift the attachment. If the attachment minute stands under the withdrawal writing, the minute stands. If there is no crossing-out, the minute is not treated as erased.
The registry annotation does not fall of itself
An attachment annotation at the land registry, the traffic registry or a registry does not of itself fall because the creditor does not want the sale. The falling is seen with a lifting or falling writing. While there is no writing, it is not said that the period expired and the annotation fell. There is no period figure on this page. Carrying the figure here would be copying the sale-request guide into this body. The guide stands under its own heading. The date of the annotation is not the date of the sale. If there is a record of sale, announcement or auction, it is read from there. If there is no record, the sale is not treated as having happened.
If the annotation carries another office's reference, it is read apart from the attachment of this file. If the reference is written in a mixed way, the annotation is not treated as erased before the reference is corrected. The debtor does not take the list on the screen for a lifting writing. The list does not take the place of the registry annotation and the office record. If the screen and the registry contradict each other, the registry record is read. If the registry extract is not in the file, the extract is not produced from a message.
If there is more than one annotation, each annotation is on its own line. One creditor not requesting the sale does not lift the annotation of another file. If belonging is not written, belonging is not completed. A pledge or a mortgage is not the lifting of this attachment. If that record stands apart, it is read apart. If it does not stand, it is not produced from the attachment annotation. Whether the annotation was struck off is seen with the striking-off writing. If there is no writing, striking off is not assumed.
An oral postponement is not a file endorsement
The creditor's message is not an enforcement endorsement. The sentence that I will not sell, or let us wait, does not drop the attachment. If the waiting has not been entered on the file, it is of no effect. An entered postponement is not a lifting either. While there is no step, it is not said that the attachment was lifted. An entered postponement does not mean the sale will never be requested either. The scope of the postponement endorsement is in the endorsement's own sentence. If there is no sentence, the scope is not widened. The debtor cannot put a screen image of the message into the file as a lifting document. The image does not erase the annotation without an office record.
The property the postponement concerns is read if it is written. If it is not written, all the property is not treated as put on hold. The postponement does not of itself take the announcement out. If the announcement stands separately, the announcement is read. If there is no announcement, the sentence let us wait is not treated as having opened a sale. A writing the creditor's representative sent later is not treated as having taken the place of the earlier oral sentence. If the writing is not in the file, the writing is not produced. If the writing exists, its scope is in the writing's own words.
A signature that the debtor accepted this postponement is read if it stands separately in the file. If it does not stand, acceptance is not assumed. Even if there is a signature, the signature is not the sentence that the debt was erased. I accept and I have no debt left are not the same line. Whichever act is written is the act that is read. If there is no act, an act is not chosen. Holding the door or hiding the property is not the route of postponement. This article does not tell those routes.
One creditor's silence does not erase the other
If there is more than one creditor, one of them not requesting does not erase the other's request. If there is a request endorsement, the sale can be on the agenda despite the words of the creditor who does not request it. The agenda is read from the endorsement. If the endorsement does not write which creditor it belongs to, belonging is not completed. A belonging that is not completed does not build the sentence that all the requests fell. If an order is not written in the file, an order is not invented. One creditor's waiver does not lift the other's attachment. If there is no waiver document, a waiver is not assumed. If the document exists, which file it concerns is read from the document.
If a joinder record is a separate line, that line is read. If there is no line, joinder is not produced from silence. A joinder record does not take the place of the request for sale either. The request is looked for separately. If the request stands, the message of the silent creditor does not cross that request out. If a crossing-out is on the minute, the crossing-out is read. If there is no crossing-out, an oral giving up is not counted as having erased the annotation.
If the creditor has changed, the change should stand in the file with an assignment or a similar record. If there is no record, a new creditor is not added. The old creditor not requesting the sale does not of itself drop the new request on the record. If two names stand side by side, the two are read apart. One is not the lifting of the other.
From which lines how long it remained is read
The debtor reads the question of how long it stays from the date of the attachment minute and from whether there is a sale-request line. If there is no line, the attachment is not treated as having fallen at once. If there is a line, the sentence of not requesting any longer does not erase the request that stands. If the date is not on the minute, the date is not added from this text. A figure is not added either. If the dates of two items of property are different, each date is on its own minute. One does not complete the other's period. If the period figure is not written on the minute, it is not added.
The announcement being electronic is under an electronic sale. Not requesting does not start the electronic sale and does not lift the attachment either. If a list stands on the screen, the list is not counted as a sale while there is no office endorsement. Paying the debt before the sale is under paying the debt before the sale. Not paying and not requesting the sale are not the same endorsement. While there is no payment document, it is not said that the debt closed. If the document exists, its amount is read as far as it is written in the document. If it is not written, an amount is not added. The document does not erase the attachment before a lifting writing is endorsed.
If the auction has happened, not requesting is no longer discussed. The route of a finished auction is under setting the auction aside. This text does not write the setting aside. While there is no auction minute, it is not said that the auction happened. If the minute exists, the sentence of not requesting does not erase the minute retrospectively. If the creditor's representative has changed, the change should stand in the file with a record of dismissal or a new power of attorney. If there is no record, the new representative is not counted as having requested the sale or as not having requested it. The old representative's message that we will not sell does not continue to be a file endorsement while there is no new record. If the message was not entered, it is of no effect from the start. If it was entered, its scope is limited to the sentence in which it was entered. A change of representative is not a lifting that lifts the attachment. The lifting is looked for separately.
The debtor can take a written protocol they made with the creditor for a document that ends the attachment. If the protocol has not entered the file, it is not an office endorsement. If it has entered, which property and which item it wrote is read from the protocol. If it does not write them, it is not said that all the attachments fell. The signature on the protocol is not a collection receipt. While there is no receipt, the cover does not close. The protocol does not of itself create the sale-request line either. The request is looked for as a separate line outside the protocol. If the line is empty, the protocol does not complete the request. A request that is not completed does not lift the attachment either.
When the copy of the attachment annotation is read, the office information is on the contact page. While there is no copy, a guess that the annotation fell or that it stands is not written.
Conclusion
Not requesting the sale does not lift the attachment at once. While there is no lifting writing, the annotation is not treated as erased. There is no period figure in this text. An oral postponement is not a file endorsement. The framework stands on the enforcement and bankruptcy law page. The basis is the attachment provisions of Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code No. 2004.